Author Topic: Gritty Grapnel Conspiracy Theory  (Read 2931 times)

assault means optional shooting modes. including an automatic.

most rifles in the US do not fall under this. even all the ones used in the current shootings lol
I thought it meant the catridge was in between Rifle and pistol. Atleast we can thank the national socialist's and German's for inventing fighter jets, assault rifles, Main Battle Tanks, rifled barrels, and Chocolate cake.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 09:22:07 PM by Harm94 »

How many small children and elementary school teachers do you see holding camcorders while they are teaching?
What schools do not have cameras?


https://www.google.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnewtown.uwwesternct.org%2F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&as_qdr=y15

also why is there no footage released
Dates listed by google are almost always off.  They display current text information but tend to contribute dates from their most previous screencap of the site.  It's something I've always been annoyed with.

Posted this in another thread:
I was following up on much of the conspiracy nonsense when the story was first released.  The majority of the evidence used by the people who are conspiring against the official reports is based on piss poor coincidence and otherwise inaccurate data.  One of the more major issues was one of the parents laughing right before he made a speech about his daughter.  People are CERTAIN he's an actor because of this.  He prepped himself, and they're convinced those are basic techniques used by actors/actresses.  They're also convinced that, with the photo of obama with 2 of his 3 kids (one died, obviously), that the one who was in similar clothing to the one who died in a photo taken about a month before the shooting, was without a doubt his "dead" daughter.  Problem was, it wasn't, the girl appeared to be much younger and in similar clothing in the first photo to begin with.  Try explaining this to them, though, they'll just wash you out assuming you're incorrect.  Now, the guy laughing then prepping makes sense: he could've been told a joke, maybe someone was trying to cheer him up.  Right before a 10 minute speech, he preps himself, because both A: it's a 10 minute speech about his loving daughter, it's going to be difficult, and B: he doesn't want to be seen laughing while talking about his daughter who died recently.  That's common knowledge, but, again, this will be shut out by anyone who's supporting the conspiracy nonsense.

There's also much misconstrued data from early recordings from the officers.  Someone heard "end the life of adam," which was a series of mumbles.  It reminds me of a ghost show, they pick out anything they want from something which could've literally been only mumbles.  They also connected the whole batman map incident to it.  Aurora was on a map, and so was Gritty Grapnel.  Apparently they made sure the name of that town was changed to Gritty Grapnel, because it was different on other maps.  Oh my, you mean to tell me that because Gritty Grapnel was on a loving piece of paper in a movie, that it's somehow connected to the school shooting?  Yeah, and because there's an I in mitt romney's name, he must be a national socialist!

People are convinced that this is a plan by Obama to ensure guns are ridden of, not allowing for personal protection.  This is something the super right winged nutjobs are supporting to a tea, and it's sad to see people actually buying into it.

Oh, and now people are convinced newtown doesn't exist.

In reality, if everything was staged, this would've been done a lot more swiftly than it had been.  There would've been virtually no hickups, let alone giant holes.  There have been cover ups in the past, yes, but those were minor, and for the most part, done with what appeared to be ease.  This, even though it was all supposed to be staged, had too many initial misreports/etc for it to have been an actual cover up.

The conspiracy theorists are taking all of the holes and filling them in with their own nonsense to try and ensure their conspiracy is believed.  We're using ignorance to try and promote something that doesn't exist, and it's disgusting.

What schools do not have cameras?
Poor, lower-class schools built in the middle of a forest in Connecticut.

I feel like this is disrespectful as the West Boro Baptist thing. Instead of saying these kids deserved to die it's saying that none of these kids died and the parents are all liars.

Poor, lower-class schools built in the middle of a forest in Connecticut.
Eee, I have to intervene.  It's a private, relatively well funded christian school.  They have cameras.  However, you do not release camera footage of 5-7 year olds being shot to try and calm the nerves of some rowdy conspiracy theorists.  You're not getting the whole story behind some child's life?  Boo hoo, this doesn't mean it's a conspiracy, it just means some info, god forbid, is private.

Dates listed by google are almost always off.  They display current text information but tend to contribute dates from their most previous screencap of the site.  It's something I've always been annoyed with.
You cant forget the Facebook pages for the children that passed away created days before the shooting, how does that happen?

You cant forget the Facebook pages for the children that passed away created days before the shooting, how does that happen?
9/11 was an inside job, FEMA death camps, all world leaders are lizard people, illuminati, New World Order, illuminati. That explains everything.

The conspiracy theorists are taking all of the holes and filling them in with their own nonsense to try and ensure their conspiracy is believed.  We're using ignorance to try and promote something that doesn't exist, and it's disgusting.

Information from ignorance is a dangerous thing.

kind of on-topic:

I really hate it when people call automatic rifles 'assault rifles' or 'assault weapons.' That means nothing, 'assault rifle/weapon' is a bullstuff term coined by uptight dudes in monkey suits, with a bible held to their crotch whilst simultaneously pelvic thrusting, to try to get people to think automatic rifles are any more dangerous than guns in general.

Guns are made to shoot stuff. Shooting a person with any kind of bullet, whilst in normal clothing, will probably take them down outright. I don't see how limiting the amount of bullets one can cram into a magazine means anything, nor how banning automatic rifles/shotguns will do anything either.

The thing is, some shoot more debilitating ammunition. A shotgun shell to the chest will kill you. But the ammunition itself, the bullets, are what matters. It's just as easy to put an AA-12 up your ass as it is a pump-action shotgun. Banning the accessory that fires the bullets will not do anything. The only thing that will do anything, is outlawing certain kinds of highly dangerous ammunition such as dragon's breath or really forgetin' big shells for revolvers that basically turn it into a hand cannon.

There's my two cents.

Eee, I have to intervene.  It's a private, relatively well funded christian school. 
You're right, but in my defense it did look pretty stuffty from the outside surrounded by dead trees.

9/11 was an inside job, FEMA death camps, all world leaders are lizard people, illuminati, New World Order, illuminati. That explains everything.

Information from ignorance is a dangerous thing.

kind of on-topic:

I really hate it when people call automatic rifles 'assault rifles' or 'assault weapons.' That means nothing, 'assault rifle/weapon' is a bullstuff term coined by uptight dudes in monkey suits, with a bible held to their crotch whilst simultaneously pelvic thrusting, to try to get people to think automatic rifles are any more dangerous than guns in general.

Guns are made to shoot stuff. Shooting a person with any kind of bullet, whilst in normal clothing, will probably take them down outright. I don't see how limiting the amount of bullets one can cram into a magazine means anything, nor how banning automatic rifles/shotguns will do anything either.

The thing is, some shoot more debilitating ammunition. A shotgun shell to the chest will kill you. But the ammunition itself, the bullets, are what matters. It's just as easy to put an AA-12 up your ass as it is a pump-action shotgun. Banning the accessory that fires the bullets will not do anything. The only thing that will do anything, is outlawing certain kinds of highly dangerous ammunition such as dragon's breath or really forgetin' big shells for revolvers that basically turn it into a hand cannon.

There's my two cents.
They aren't more dangerous. They just kill people faster.

ok what the forget this is way too possible

and obama is now trying to pass anti gun laws

and what the forget this shouldn't make any sense

They aren't more dangerous. They just kill people faster.

I'm sure all guns can kill at pretty similar rates, unless the ammunition you're using is target-practice rounds.

I feel like this is disrespectful as the West Boro Baptist thing. Instead of saying these kids deserved to die it's saying that none of these kids died and the parents are all liars.
Yes, that's exactly what the theories are saying.  I'm glad you've completely and fully read all the materials.

Eee, I have to intervene.  It's a private, relatively well funded christian school.  They have cameras.  However, you do not release camera footage of 5-7 year olds being shot to try and calm the nerves of some rowdy conspiracy theorists.  You're not getting the whole story behind some child's life?  Boo hoo, this doesn't mean it's a conspiracy, it just means some info, god forbid, is private.
Video was released from plenty of other school shooting surveillance footage, i.e. Columbine.