Poll

Abortions?

Yay
141 (66.8%)
Nay
46 (21.8%)
Undecisive
24 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 211

Author Topic: Abortions? Yay or Nay?  (Read 10694 times)

now we rewind to the 14 page debate on where life is defined

now we rewind to the 14 page debate on where life is defined
I'm going to reiterate that the way we currently have it set up with the trimester system seems perfectly reasonable to me.

Aswell as the sanctity of a man's seed;
" Genesis 38:9-10
But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his. So whenever he went in to his brother's wife he would waste the semen on the ground, so as not to give offspring to his brother. And what he did was wicked in the sight of the Lord, and he put him to death also. "
And there you go, procrastination is sentence to death. Someone better kill me now.

And there you go, procrastination is sentence to death. Someone better kill me now.
That's what the catholics believe.
Same reason homoloveual relationships aren't accepted, among other reasons.
And also why they won't put a condom on their willy, and think the rhythm method is a good contraceptive. Which I really don't get, because if spilling it on the ground is bad because it can't make a child, then surely trying to have love when a child can't be made is just as bad.


Who knows, maybe there is Christian out their who is pro-choice. After all We can't generalize an entire group.

This just turned into a religious argument.
ABANDON THREAD.

This just turned into a religious argument.
ABANDON THREAD.
You were kicked out of this thread for being an idiot, shoo.
And no, just religious agreements and discussion, no arguments.

You were kicked out of this thread for being an idiot, shoo.
And no, just religious agreements and discussion, no arguments.
Then there is going to be an argument very, very, soon.
I can almost taste it.

Then there is going to be an argument very, very, soon.
I can almost taste it.
You taste stuff
go away


I'm pretty sure that the common passages that are used to defend against abortion are ones used for other such things.
Including the sanctity of life;
Yeah, but that's just a personal interpretation. Regarding the sanctity of life, does anyone use that as a defense for vegetarianism?

Any kind of argument touching on moral issues will almost always devolve into a religion argument with half the posts going "oh it's not an argument it's a kind, calm discussion <:)" and the other half locked in a "NO I'M RIGHT" playground whinefest and eventually the handicap OP will cry and go "gosh you weren't supposed to argue >:(" and lock the thread.

And that's how babies are made.

Then there is going to be an argument very, very, soon.
I can almost taste it.
I don't know if you noticed, but all the people contesting ideas and beliefs for the last few days were arguing.

Any kind of argument touching on moral issues will almost always devolve into a religion argument with half the posts going "oh it's not an argument it's a kind, calm discussion <:)" and the other half locked in a "NO I'M RIGHT" playground whinefest and eventually the handicap OP will cry and go "gosh you weren't supposed to argue >:(" and lock the thread.

And that's how babies are made.
sums it up pretty nicely.

Yeah, but that's just a personal interpretation. Regarding the sanctity of life, does anyone use that as a defense for vegetarianism?
What do you mean?
Using biblical sanctity of life as reasoning for being a vegetarian?

That wouldn't make sense, because the Bible doesn't see Animal Life as divine.
Only humans are made in Gods image, which is why they are sacred.
The argument doesn't lend itself to care for animals.


Also, I don't see how many other interpretations there can be of the numerous passages in all the Hebrew-based holy books that refer to Man being made in Gods image.
Especially when linked to other passages depicting how men should not be killed.