Poll

What should happen to the price of HamHost?

Make it completely free. All features of the web control panel will br available for everybody.
Keep it free/premium, but give half of the features to free users.
Continue making more (web) control panel features for premium users, and occasionally make one for unpaid clients.
Keep adding more control panel features for premium users, but add none for free clients.
Make HamHost paid-only.

Author Topic: HamHost Dedicated Blockland servers | New poll: More free-user features?  (Read 113629 times)

Kinda odd you do all those chores just to pay for a Blockland hosting service, I certainly wouldn't do that.
That's until users start getting premium accounts.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 10:44:34 AM by hammereditor² »

Nevermind. I sent you an email. Resolution issue is still not resolved for me.
I am currently making a modification to the client application where it automatically resizes the GUI based on the current screen resolution.
Also, I may try to get a MX record for hammereditor.net, so e-mails are received and sent properly.

Code: [Select]
Your message could not be delivered to the following address(es):

<[name not shown]@yahoo.co.uk>
smtp;WELCOME 421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from 178.238.227.202 will be permanently deferred; Retrying will NOT succeed. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/421-ts03.html


Original message follows.

Received: from httpmail.local[178.238.227.202] by www.hammereditor.net[178.238.227.202]
(SMTPD32); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:21:05 +0200
X-Originating-IP: 173.61.131.242
References: <1376669996.12061.YahooMailNeo@web171205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1376669996.12061.YahooMailNeo@web171205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
X-Originating-Sender: support@mail.hammereditor.net
X-EAS-Auth-User: support@mail.hammereditor.net
X-Originating-To: [name not shown]@yahoo.co.uk
Message-ID: <51ad65d548911c38f651d5f66750c7a3@mail.hammereditor.net>
From: "HamHost Support" <support@mail.hammereditor.net>
To: "[name not shown]" <[name not shown]@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Hosting service
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:21:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is why a lot of my clients think I never reply to their e-mails.

EDIT: I now have a MX record. I will see if Yahoo! e-mails are successfully sent soon.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 04:35:17 PM by hammereditor² »

posting clients email addresses in public forum threads is hardly professional ... i think you should edit that

also an MX record isn't gunna help you lmao, mainstream email providers wont just trust you because you throw some dumb mx record into your dns

Why don't you just reply to emails normally via a normal email address such as mail.com or some other email company. It's not like you have 50 clients and you need to be like steam and reply with "support@ hamhost.com" or something.

And it's not like you receive 500 emails daily about issues, you only have 5 clients.

That guy is probably and alt of Ephialtes or Lub.

I tried to send him a PM but he already blocked my PMs. Ephialtes is also known to use alts to hide his identity when he makes posts he shouldn't be making.

That guy is probably and alt of Ephialtes or Lub.

I tried to send him a PM but he already blocked my PMs. Ephialtes is also known to use alts to hide his identity when he makes posts he shouldn't be making.

Err no that's definitely a post I'd make. There's nothing contentious in there; it's unprofessional to just publish client email addresses on public forums and an MX record won't do anything to get providers like Yahoo or Gmail to trust what you're sending.

Err no that's definitely a post I'd make. There's nothing contentious in there; it's unprofessional to just publish client email addresses on public forums and an MX record won't do anything to get providers like Yahoo or Gmail to trust what you're sending.
Certainly there's an issue, but why are you trying to hide your identity?

I'm currently trying to play around with process piping and getting content from the Internet so I can eliminate this whole System_HamHost add-on. It's a piece of inefficient garbage, so I'm trying to input text directly.
I already created a working Command Prompt in the Java console.

What does System_HamHost do?

Why not just copy in that add-on when the server starts?

Certainly there's an issue, but why are you trying to hide your identity?

I agree. Does this not seem suspicious?

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=239713.msg6834389#msg6834389

this is what happens when you try to hack around a game's functionality, you end up with some dumb thing with crap usability

i either have to get people to download each texture pack TWICE to avoid a zip extraction bug or i have to try and explain to them how to correctly extract a zip archive to the right place? i think we all know option #2 will never work

too complicated, bad implementation, silly web hosting requirement, 0/10 sorry

"Get PEOPLE" and "web hosting requirement", "explain to them"


He already doesn't like the idea but uses a different account to talk trash

For me this is a feature I think Blockland should either provide support for or fully implement itself. RTB would have to work around the launcher to implement this and that's not something I'd be willing to do with RTB.

So once there's some kind of official support for brick texture changing I could do something.

Also, search "implement" and "implementation" by Ephialtes - it just keeps raising suspicion that he's hiding his identity.



« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 05:26:18 PM by {Pacnet2013} »

What does System_HamHost do?

Why not just copy in that add-on when the server starts?
The point of the new system I'm developing is to create a more sturdy, simple, and efficient way to send eval commands and get the server stats.

The point of the new system I'm developing is to create a more sturdy, simple, and efficient way to send eval commands and get the server stats.
You ignored my second question?

Are you trying to host your own mail server? Why would you not let someone else do a much better job for no cost?

Are you trying to host your own mail server? Why would you not let someone else do a much better job for no cost?
The mail server has now been fixed.
An inbox redirection service was added to the domain. You can now reliably send e-mails.

Why not just copy in that add-on when the server starts?

Because that would cause unnecessary disk IO. Why not just place the add-on in the Add-Ons folder when the server is setup and not give the client write/delete access to the file?