Author Topic: "Meanwhile In Syria"  (Read 27746 times)

The countries of the middle east are great at killing each other and we don't need to spend money and American lives to get involved.
GEE. I WONDER WHY THE MIDDLE EAST IS SO CHAOTIC. ITS NOT LIKE ANY FOREIGN COUNTRIES WERE THE CAUSE OF IT...

GEE. I WONDER WHY THE MIDDLE EAST IS SO CHAOTIC. ITS NOT LIKE ANY FOREIGN COUNTRIES WERE THE CAUSE OF IT...
we bankrupted ourselves by loving it all up.  we can't continue loving it up by intervening even more.

the iraq invasion was also an intervention, because we thought that an evil dictator who we used to be ok with had weapons of mass destruction and were in use and woops he didn't have any and iraq is a stuffhole for sure now.  gg america wooo yeah.

During any civil war, it's best not to intervene. I hope Obama doesn't do the same thing as Bush did. Kerry yesterday said "we know that they used chemical weapons", that's great Kerry but it doesn't mean we get our hands in the wrong places again. Hopefully Obama is smart about this.

During any civil war, it's best not to intervene. I hope Obama doesn't do the same thing as Bush did. Kerry yesterday said "we know that they used chemical weapons", that's great Kerry but it doesn't mean we get our hands in the wrong places again. Hopefully Obama is smart about this.
if i remember correctly someone in the white house said that they're not going to step foot on foreign territory or something like that

During any civil war, it's best not to intervene. I hope Obama doesn't do the same thing as Bush did. Kerry yesterday said "we know that they used chemical weapons", that's great Kerry but it doesn't mean we get our hands in the wrong places again. Hopefully Obama is smart about this.

obama has already invaded (by definition) more nations then bush has. and syria is likely next.

obama has already invaded (by definition) more nations then bush has. and syria is likely next.
What are you talking about? We are out of iraq, pulling out of afghanistan, and we haven't put boots on any other countries. Obama never "invaded" anyone.

What are you talking about? We are out of iraq, pulling out of afghanistan, and we haven't put boots on any other countries. Obama never "invaded" anyone.

Uganda, Sudan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo. all boots on ground.

libya and soon syria may only be air, but its still an act of war

even pakistan was an illegal act of war

all have been obama

you watch to much fox/cnn/bbc to apparently know the definition of war, or to even know what is actually going on in the world.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2013, 11:13:42 AM by Bisjac »

Uganda, Sudan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo. all boots on ground.
UN was there before Obama though.

Uganda, Sudan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo. all boots on ground.

libya and soon syria may only be air, but its still an act of war

even pakistan was an illegal act of war

all have been obama

you watch to much fox/cnn/bbc to apparently know the definition of war, or to even know what is actually going on in the world.
I watch MSNBC and Aljazeera.
And I hope you're joking, because we only have a very small amount of military advisors in those countries. No soldiers, nothing. Just advisors that don't engage opposing forces.
You watch too much of nothing obviously because you're definitely not informed or just ignorant on this issue.
link
another link
Also, do you know the definition of invasion? Well, that's what you were talking about in your prior post, and now you're talking about acts of war? An act of war isn't an invasion moron

An act of war isn't an invasion moron

It isn't?

Invasion;
An instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
Act of War;
An act of aggression by a country against another with which it is nominally at peace.

Isn't an invasion an act of war since you're using armed force to invade a country, therefore acting aggressive against another country?

Invasion is an act of war
But, an act of war isn't necessarily an invasion.

Invasion is an act of war
But, an act of war isn't necessarily an invasion.

I get that but reading Bisjac's replies, he's saying invasion is an act of war. I don't understand where he said that an act of war is an invasion.

Russia allies with turkey and iran and they bring a smack down onto Israel while Israel's allies refuse to help

That's the prophecy that begins Armageddon.
I don't think that Russia would ally with Turkey, and I don't think the USA would refuse to help.

GEE. I WONDER WHY THE MIDDLE EAST IS SO CHAOTIC. ITS NOT LIKE ANY FOREIGN COUNTRIES WERE THE CAUSE OF IT...
The Middle East was a terrible stuffhole before World War 2. Stop pretending everything was so fine and dandy. Islam is an intolerant, violent religion, and anyone who denies that is blinder than a bat.

It isn't?

Invasion;
An instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
Act of War;
An act of aggression by a country against another with which it is nominally at peace.

Isn't an invasion an act of war since you're using armed force to invade a country, therefore acting aggressive against another country?
No, it's not. In an invasion you are taking over a country or chunk of land, whereas an act of war is say bombing designated targets, putting up an embargo against a nation, blockading a navy, etc. An invasion is more than an act of war, it is complete war. An act of war is not an invasion because of the range of things that define an act of war.