Author Topic: I came out to my mom this morning (The Gay Megathread)  (Read 20087 times)


how do you know if you gay anyways
do you get boners looking at guys or something

ummm, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
we're not talking about the majority, are we? you said that all gay people aren't really gay

Instead of argue that you don't have a clue what you're talking about and have bad comprehension skills, I'm going to sum up what happened:

  • I posted saying that I didn't think that being gay was a natural thing.
  • After the very first negative post, I quickly added that I was confused and was not flaming or hating on anyone.
  • So apparently, I'm running from a manhunt because my views are different while being flamed for confusion

Yeah, this is an Internet side effect.  I still think that it is totally irrational (before pulling things out of context, I mean that the whole "argument" against me is irrational).  Just like the atheists complaining about Christians trying to get their attention and revert their beliefs, I'm in the exact same place in this argument.  Exact.  I call hypocrisy.

how do you know if you gay anyways
do you get boners looking at guys or something
No stuff lol. I've whacked off to guys since I was in seventh grade (not gay research, mostly just shirtless guys) but the thought of being gay never crossed my mind until I came to the realization I had a crush on my best friend.

how do you know if you gay anyways
do you get boners looking at guys or something
you're kidding tho right
I posted saying that I didn't think that being gay was a natural thing.
wrong. maybe you have a bad memory or something
you said that people are only gay because they're either
A. confused
or B. doing it just cus they want to

People grow up being gay, no one actually chooses their loveuality.  And if you disagree with this, let me ask you something: Do you ever remember choosing between being loveually attracted to a girl or a man?

Child: I think i'll be attracted to men for my life!

Yeah that's not how it works, I'm sure most of you agree, just letting those others know.  But everyone has a voice, and if you end up arguing with them and they just don't stop, it's best to give up because arguing with impossible people is just endless, it's better to have self-control and not respond.

props to you, builda
more balls than me haha

But are we implying that people holding the view that homoloveuality is natural are the only "rational" "educated" "intelligent" people. Just need a little emphasis there. Does this give us permission to be disrespectful, spiteful and outright rude?
HOORAY WORD TWISTING. I never said one specific stance was the only intelligent one.
I said that if you go into a debate about that you are uneducated about, and expecting people to take your word, when it directly contradicts the word of professional in the relevant field who have spent years researching the subject is not intelligent.
I see people do this on both sides of every issue.

how do you know if you gay anyways
do you get boners looking at guys or something
The same way someone knows their straight.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2014, 04:48:03 PM by Headcrab Zombie »

I called him pond scum
freakin pond scum and trash
those are so non-offensive it's ridiculous
it's not a big deal and you really need to get over it because that was like five seven pages ago
If they're non-offensive why did you call him it? Regardless of how minor you may find it, you still called him it just to cause offence.

And people take the meaning of words differently.
I personally think being called scum is horrible, regardless of if you specify it as pond scum.
(and I'm not saying I don't call people scum, because I do when I intend to be horrible to them)

I called him pond scum
freakin pond scum and trash
those are so non-offensive it's ridiculous
it's not a big deal and you really need to get over it because that was like five seven pages ago
It is a big deal if you want people to understand and respect your position. This is the internet so I'm assuming you couldn't give a stuff about it anyway. Offensiveness is subjective. I didn't find it offensive but I am pointing out that just because you think you're above someone because of the beliefs you hold doesn't give you the right to call names rather than start a rational discussion. I have no doubt you don't even act in the crumby manner you do in a real situation involving defending your beliefs because it could end up getting you hurt.
I said that going into a debate on a subject about which you are entirely uneducated about, and expecting people to take your word, when it directly contradicts the word of professional in the relevant field who have spent years researching the subject is not intelligent.
The problem with this is that its entirely optional whether or not TO take his word for it. Thats what an opinion is. Something to consider or ignore. Because of his stance naturally you can only assume that he isn't researched and indeed hasn't studied. Why? because he's the opposition. Whether you take one side or the other its incredibly difficult to look at someone else through unbiased lenses. Even if they present an argument thats really good.

A little off topic: And speaking of which, just because someone has the label "scientist" or "professional" doesn't mean you need to lap up every last word they say as a fact. This is what has killed critical thinking. Nobody thinks beyond the teacher or the classroom anymore. A person can study for years and still be wrong.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2014, 04:55:25 PM by Tayasaurus »

A person can study for years and still be wrong.
Yeah, but it's a heck of a lot less likely than the person who's only just considered the subject being entirely correct.

props to you, builda
more balls than me haha
well because your parents are religious

well because your parents are religious
no theyre just handicaps and they dont get ill never talk to them about something personal and probably never will
i have no plans to ever tell them

If they're non-offensive why did you call him it? Regardless of how minor you may find it, you still called him it just to cause offence.
not really
I mean, I was purposefully trying to make the pond scum thing as silly as I could because I didn't want people to think I was being serious. it didn't work .-.
and trash wasn't really supposed to be either
I've never seriously called people "pond scum" or "trash" even :v

No harm intended but..
Why do we need to know this.