Author Topic: Collapse of Western Antarctic ice sheet  (Read 8131 times)

And I'm not saying it isn't???
Youre saying theres no evidence for evolution or climate change, there isnt even a reason to argue somebody that completely denies evidence like that

Same could be said by creationists? Opinions opinions everywhere.
It's not an opinion, it's a theory. Most people have no clue what the definition of theory is, so I'll tell you. A theory is a scientific explanation of observed facts. For instance:

 - Over time, organisms are getting more complex
 - Organisms adapt in ways that help them in their environment
 - Often, similar organisms have similar DNA
 - The embryology and anatomy of animals shows similar trends

These are all undeniably true. So, by connecting the dots, we get the theory of evolution. Just because something's a theory doesn't make it less true, or subjective in any way. It just means that it's not a direct fact, which is something you can say yes/no from by looking at data. Let's look at global warming.

 - CO2 levels are the highest they've been for all of human history
 - CO2 levels have been increasing at a rate higher than ever seen before
 - Humans are running processes that output a lot of CO2
 - CO2 is proven to create a greenhouse effect that increases temperature
 - Global temperatures are rising.

These facts are all undeniably true, proven from many sources. So, if we connect the dots, we get a theory of global warming. Human activity increases CO2 production, CO2 production increases CO2 levels, CO2 increases temperature, and therefore human activity is increasing temperature. There's no opinion here. It's a very solid theory built on undeniable facts. Could it be wrong? Yes, it could. We could find a better explanation in the future. Is it wrong? Not as far as we know. There's no other explanation that can be decently proven, so for all intents and purposes it's correct.

Going no where, not changing my beliefs on both topics at all thanks for the waste of time. Later.

Going no where, not changing my beliefs on both topics at all thanks for the waste of time. Later.
The problem here isn't that you're believing the wrong thing. It's that you're believing at all. It's not something you believe in or not, like dieties. I can argue all day that a god doesn't exist or does exist, but it won't go anywhere because it's just a belief or opinion. Scientific theories, on the other hand, exist. You don't believe in the existence of a desk. The desk is proven to exist. Likewise, you don't believe in global warming, also proven to exist. The planet doesn't give a stuff whether you believe it or not, it's temperatures are increasing no matter what. There's no opinion here.

I don't believe global warming exists. It just does exist.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2014, 10:21:22 PM by TristanLuigi »

I do not see the problem here. The water level is not going to rise at all, it's already at it's full extent since the ice is already in the water. Grab a bowl, fill it with water and drop an icecube or two. Mark the water level, then come back when the icecubes have melted. The water level is going to be the same.
im sorry, but you are a loving idiot.

im sorry, but you are a loving idiot.
im sorry, but you are incredibly late. forgot there was a difference between salt water and fresh water.

Okay, what? Glaciers are not totally in the water. If the part that was under the water melted while the top magically floated, the water level would not change. But there's also the part on top that is not in the water, so that would raise the sea level.

ice floats because it's less dense than water...?

Shutup until you do your research, creationism is bullstuff

shut up

im sorry, but you are a loving idiot.

shut up

forgot there was a difference between salt water and fresh water.
but thats not why you're wrong AAAAAAAAAAAA

lol every time kearn posts its just honestly hilarious and cringe at the same time

Going no where, not changing my beliefs on both topics at all thanks for the waste of time. Later.

lol every time kearn posts its just honestly hilarious and cringe at the same time

Welp, I'm not going to cash in all my tokens on a theory.

I have not ANY evidence at all to evolution either besides "ohoho you see these parts of a skeleton look like a human AAANNNDDD a monkey confirmed evolution!!!" Care to back up your case?

okay lemmie find my old post...

If the fossil record held MORE bridges than animals that are already existing today, then I wouldn't have any problem with accepting it.  There just simply aren't enough to be considered the missing links behind Darwin's ideas.
first let me tell ya. you know what dogs are? there were actually wolves or some stuff us humans forced to breed together to evolve into a 'dog' species we like.

now think whales. they big huh? ye. now check out their skeleleletoneton

DAFUK
dey have pelvis and femur wtf they dont have legs!1!1!
now think of this, what if whales DID have legs. now imagine that a mutation happened. wtf no leg. somehow it survives and breeds with female. most of the offspring have no legs too wtf???? now imagine they had offspring too. eventually these weird as hell LEGLESS WHALES are becoming dominant because the environment is perfect for them. leged whales die out. bummer :(

here's some wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent

it also lists some specific examples

don't trust wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent#References
list o' references that wikipedia is using. choose your poison

also HUMANS DID NOT COME FROM MONKEYS AAAAAAAAA

THINK OF MONKEYS AS A CUSIN OR SOMETHING, NOT AN ANCESTOR

CAPS

lol every time kearn posts its just honestly hilarious and cringe at the same time

man somebodys passive-aggressive today



shut up

shut up

Telling people to stop talking doesn't help anything at all ever in no way no how