Sorry, not buying it. You're telling me that modifying food to remove the seeds adds nutritional value? Or are you and I just not on the same page here?
Two problems here. One:
The whole idea of a 1-generation seed that goes sterile after planting was actually proposed and thrown out by Monsanto. The only reason people still like to pretend it was a thing is because it's great ammunition against big agriculture companies. The only problem is that it never happened.
Two, there's
far more than can be done with genetic engineering. Possibly the biggest example of food that is engineered to be more nutritional is
golden rice, which is a normal rice breed with an added gene for beta-carotene, a vitamin A precursor. The corn thus produces nutrients that it normally wouldn't, making it more nutritional.
GMO foods can also increase yield in many ways, reducing the cost of foods, or allowing them to better survive in areas (different temperature, water levels, salinty, etc) where they otherwise wouldn't, helping to feed impoverished areas.
Genetic modification exists outside of agriculture, too. For example, the insulin used as a supplement by diabetics is produced by bacteria with the human insulin gene added
Poll