Author Topic: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.  (Read 9414 times)

"code a bracelet"
"code a selfie into a funny picture"
"code a picture of some character"
"code a gif"
"code a song"
What the forget do they even think coding is?
FYI
all of that stuff requires code at some level
so
the reason women get called bossy is because when they try to command people they sound like a bitch doing it
this whole post is a joke
i disagree entirely with this whole get rid of loveism stuff, it applies to entirely voiding the right to have the freedom of speech
for future reference, the right to free speech does not actually mean you can say whatever you want to say with no consequences

FYI
all of that stuff requires code at some level
sothis whole post is a jokefor future reference, the right to free speech does not actually mean you can say whatever you want to say with no consequences
i honestly think as humans we should have the right to express our opinions in any way possible, but you go with what you want to do

the reason women get called bossy is because when they try to command people they sound like a bitch doing it
and they act like a control whore, telling everyone what to do, so they want to prevent their so called "self esteem" from going into the floor.
i mean seriously i get called a richard and stuff sometimes and my self esteem doesnt change
how does this even happen? do people have some brainset image if they arent treated like a loving queen that they need to stop having people treat them that way so they make some campaign to ban a word?
tl;dr, women are "bossy" because they are control whores and want to be treated like a 15 year old schoolgirl who just got a rich boyfriend
thats because with male authority it seems like male's have more power in what they are actually doing, so when a woman comes up and changes everything by using authority, they get bitchy and act like they want to be treated like they're the top class, so thats why men call them a bitch and they dont want them leading stuff, because men know in the end that the women leading the role are just going to forget up or something

i disagree entirely with this whole get rid of loveism stuff, it applies to entirely voiding the right to have the freedom of speech and say whatever you want in your opinion, it just forgetin breaks the right to have freedom of speech and opinions, because we as males wont have the right to talk about our opinions on women, but women can talk about us? talk about loveism, they're turning stuff around.
what the forget does bossy have to do with anything? this is an entirely different campaign. you're pulling stuff out of your ass. you can't just generalize all of female authority like that. i don't know how you think you're qualified to say stuff like this when you're like 12.

The people who worked on this project most likely supported all the way. But they wouldn't have made if they couldn't make money off of it long term. The stockholders wouldn't allow it. This project was also intended to make google seem better among their completion, not just to make money. That's a huge reason why they decided to spend money on this project oppose to other ones, Google wanted to seem better than their completion so they could be more popular among the masses.
Considering the reaction this got from the Blockland forum, they're not attempting to appeal to "the masses", but women.
youre not a woman so you wouldnt really understand, but i feel it's a legitimate problem.

most girls i know, including myself most of the time, shy away from leadership roles simply because people dont respect female authority the same way they respect male authority at all. leadership qualities are seen as strong and attractive in a man, and bitchy and nagging in a female.
tru
i honestly think as humans we should have the right to express our opinions in any way possible, but you go with what you want to do
tl;dr "i have no counter argument"

i honestly think as humans we should have the right to express our opinions in any way possible, but you go with what you want to do
you're entire post record is a counter argument to this

Well basic human rights deem us to do as we please so long as we are prepared for consequences of others doing as THEY please. So we find a safe middle ground that we can both live in.

Bill of rights is different and dosn't apply.

Well basic human rights deem us to do as we please so long as we are prepared for consequences of others doing as THEY please. So we find a safe middle ground that we can both live in.

Bill of rights is different and dosn't apply.
I always thought basic human rights were being able to do as we please so long as we don't harm another person or impede on their rights.

Well that's the same thing. But my way makes it sound like a choice and yours makes it sound like a rule

Well that's the same thing. But my way makes it sound like a choice and yours makes it sound like a rule
Third wave feminism still concerns itself with human rights, although what they're doing isn't as tangible. That doesn't mean it's insubstantial. First wave feminists were fighting for the right to vote, own land, etc. They just needed laws passed. Second and third wave concern[ed] themselves with the values of our society and how they hurt women. This topic is pretty good evidence that feminism's role still isn't over, people are still stuffting on attempts by feminism to get rid of gender disparities in certain fields.

Woman already have the same opertunities that this program is promoting. The fact that there is less woman in the field is irrelevant to equality. If you simply give woman more so some statistics even out, you have to bypass equality to do so.

Woman's rights was also about empowerment. That's not an entitlment, or some gift. The woman have to give it to thsemselves. And no one is stopping them from doing so.
This new wave of feminism is just fighting for the handouts that all groups fight for and no one deserves

Woman already have the same opertunities that this program is promoting. The fact that there is less woman in the field is irrelevant to equality. If you simply give woman more so some statistics even out, you have to bypass equality to do so.

Woman's rights was also about empowerment. That's not an entitlment, or some gift. The woman have to give it to thsemselves. And no one is stopping them from doing so.
This new wave of feminism is just fighting for the handouts that all groups fight for and no one deserves
youre not a woman so you wouldnt really understand, but i feel it's a legitimate problem.

most girls i know, including myself most of the time, shy away from leadership roles simply because people dont respect female authority the same way they respect male authority at all. leadership qualities are seen as strong and attractive in a man, and bitchy and nagging in a female.
Women shy away from these fields because gender roles. They're made to believe only men pursue certain careers.

Then google should tell woman to stop popping babies and stay out of the kitchen. What they are instead doing is supporting that woman are weak and need special help because they are incapable.

Men aren't forcing genders roles on them. It seems men are doing just fine without traditional gender roles of woman.

Then google should tell woman to stop popping babies and stay out of the kitchen. What they are instead doing is supporting that woman are weak and need special help because they are incapable.

Men aren't forcing genders roles on them. It seems men are doing just fine without traditional gender roles of woman.
They're enabling women to help themselves. Creating interest in computer science is not handholding.

They're enabling women to help themselves. Creating interest in computer science is not handholding.

could they at least not say DNA is in ice cream

could they at least not say DNA is in ice cream
I have no idea what the deal with that is. The rest seems good though.