Author Topic: sims 4 is going to be awful, apparently  (Read 4464 times)

this is 100% (or maybe 90%) bullstuff.

game companies want to attract players to get money, they don't want to piss off players, because they won't get any money.

what the op is talking about is probably some console version of sims 4 or something.

Don't post if you have no idea what the forget are you even talking about.
Not to mention we are talking about EA here.

i see no links or anything, for all i know what's in the op could have just been made up

i'd like some proof of this idiocy

i see no links or anything, for all i know what's in the op could have just been made up

i'd like some proof of this idiocy

If you would actually read the thread (in fact, just the first bloody page), he posted the source link to the article.
Not everything has a citation/source though.

If you would actually read the thread (in fact, just the first bloody page), he posted the source link to the article.

chill

i see no links or anything, for all i know what's in the op could have just been made up

i'd like some proof of this idiocy

http://ts4news.com/post/94541924952/89-features-missing-from-the-sims-4

Click the little (x)'s next to the claims.

chill

http://ts4news.com/post/94541924952/89-features-missing-from-the-sims-4

Click the little (x)'s next to the claims.
I'm as chill as a heater in a freezer in a oven in the Antarctic.

Wow, forget you too EA.

Guess I'll be playing Sims 3 for the next half-decade, plus waiting for your expansions to become dirt cheap on Steam before I even consider buying them. Luckily Valve gets a cut of whatever I'll be buying from EA in the future.


good luck with that pal

I'm as chill as a heater in a freezer in a oven in the Antarctic.

You should respond in a way that reflects that, then. Your tone suggests hostility and aggression where it's completely unwarranted.

You should respond in a way that reflects that, then. Your tone suggests hostility and aggression where it's completely unwarranted.
I have no idea how did you manage to comprehend what I meant there.

[]http://www.xboxculture.com/uploads/03decd1a6f03fbbd251214b0bd213664.png[/img]

good luck with that pal

Steam versions of EA Games (And Sims) do not require Origin to be played (Thank God).
It's pretty hillarious how EA succeeds in that department more than Ubisoft. You don't need Origin for Steam games but you need UPlay for Steam games, like, wat.

This is making me upset.

The Sims 3 has been one of my favorite games, and The Sims 2 is something I grew up with. They're stuffting on one of my favorite series.

still love EA & still hyped. eat me, ya nerds.

I have no idea how did you manage to comprehend what I meant there.
yikes, whatever you say man

still love EA & still hyped. eat me, ya nerds.
If it's anything like the gameplay videos, I'm sure it's still going to be a good game. Shortcoming, but not trash.

If it's anything like the gameplay videos, I'm sure it's still going to be a good game. Shortcoming, but not trash.

In all honesty, this is true.
It is a huge downgrade of features from previous titles, but it does bring it's own share of things to the table.
The hybrid neighborhood will most likely mean better in-game optimization, additionally - the Sims 3 open world was /extremely/ empty, and you can't deny that. The only place Sims 3 open world exceeded was exploring for ores/bugs for a tiny tiny share of cash, or in World Adventures. World Adventures was the only expansion/place in Sims 3 where it genuinely benefited from open world, outside of that, the neighborhoods and everything felt extremely empty and lifeless inside the Sims 3. I would rather in the end have my Sims teleport to a already populated location than have to make them run/drive/cab there in order for it to be populated afterwards and even then feel lifeless. The consistent loading screens would be an issue, however I would like to hear some input on how long they take, if they load quicker than ever before, that'd be a good thing in the end.
About the graphics, about them being more cartoonish / worse than even TS3, I don't know what you're talking about, they look great in this style and it fits the whole universe/theme of the game very well.
I think the best bet for anyone at this point is not to buy the game and just wait for some actual reviewers to have a look over it.
Caring over the house was also downgraded, but in favor it was made so that you have more care for your sims. While you don't have many collections of customization in the CAS about the personality, in-game the Sims can gain bunch of stuff and there is a way bigger amount of Skills your Sim can gain compared to any other game (Except WooHoo now). For instance, artistic skill is now split into art/musical etc. If you are a master a painting you no longer can perfect a guitar instantly, which makes more sense.
The game seems to lack in medieval/old furniture/building options, and I personally love that. The base Sims games before came with a very poor/ugly selection of modern/contemporary furniture and decorations but now in TS4 there seems to be a bunch of them.
People are complaining about babies being objects, and about toddlers being removed from the game. Please don't tell me anyone actually enjoyed those stages, they were tedious and annoying in all instances.
Floor limitation while being silly, I doubt it will have that much impact on creativity and general game enjoyment. It will limit the excessively artistic creativity with really silly designs and stuff like that, but we are talking about houses here, not buildings. Houses generally don't have more than 3 floors, and there's generally not a need to have that many to begin with. I am sure the limit will be raised when we will receive a building expansion pack, like it has in TS3.
No story progression? "Sims age, but do not get married, divorced, move, change jobs etc.". This was not in any of the Sims. A TS3 mod "fixed" progression and it does what is used there, however there is no excuse for using that as a argument, a mod is a mod.

The reasons to be genuinely upset about the game are the features which are to be released within DLCs, like pools, since the claims why they can't put them in the base game ARE bullstuff. And maybe the custom texture/coloring CAS, that's also a really big loss. And also no height slider/all age groups have the same height (which is indeed very silly). And some certain nitpicked removals that only certain people enjoyed.

The reasons to be genuinely upset about the game are the features which are to be released within DLCs, like pools, since the claims why they can't put them in the base game ARE bullstuff. And maybe the custom texture/coloring CAS, that's also a really big loss. And also no height slider/all age groups have the same height (which is indeed very silly). And some certain nitpicked removals that only certain people enjoyed.
They very very likely just ran out of time for pools, and I'll totally eat my hat if they don't add them back in. Hell, with all this ruckus, maybe for free. I'll take the claims about create a style at face value and assume that it wrecked lower end systems so it was in the name of optimization. Sucks, but it's still a step above TS2 (for clothing at least). Lack of height control is dumb and likely got passed over so they could add more walk cycles or some crap like that lol. I dunno why you guys always ALWAYS jump on "DLC-ized" as the reason for missing content.

Really most of the moaning seems to come from the "family-style" players, who like cultivating generations of sims and creating legacies. Since I could give a stuff about that (I almost always turn aging & story progression stuff off), it really doesn't bug me.



Then again, I'm just a paid EA shill, here to astroturf :-)


Sims 3: Ugly, inconsistent, weird realistic/cartoon bullstufftery
Sims 4: Artistic flow and style consistency