Author Topic: Five Nights at Freddy's 1 and 2 and also 3 I think  (Read 344807 times)

or maybe this could just make the animatronics even more creepier?

tbh i think making the animatronics being haunted and possessed by dead children is pretty stupid.

also, it says "police think the suspect dressed up as a mascot", not that they're sure. And of course they'll blame someone, they're not going to think "hm these animatronics must've been walking around on their own and killed these kids!"

i'm pretty sure there are kid and night watchmen remains stuffed into those suits, but they're not controlling them or haunting anything.

That only proves that the animatronics have already gone through what they are trying to do to you.

A hallucination?

"hm these animatronics must've been walking around on their own and killed these kids!"
They were allowed to walk around until the "bite of '87" where Foxy actually took a bite out of some kid's head and took the entire frontal lobe. That's why the pirate cove is out of order.


That only proves that the animatronics have already gone through what they are trying to do to you.
No, the killer was actually an employee at Freddy's. He killed the kids and stuffed the remains into the animatronic mascots. That's why the faces had blood and mucus in the third article. The reanimated carcasses of the children who were killed try to stuff you into other exoskeletons because that's what happened to them.

No, the killer was actually an employee at Freddy's.
source on this?
They were allowed to walk around until the "bite of '87" where Foxy actually took a bite out of some kid's head and took the entire frontal lobe. That's why the pirate cove is out of order.
you completely missed what i meant.

someone shop foxy's face onto blueblur's avatar and jpeg it

someone shop foxy's face onto blueblur's avatar and jpeg it
I will use that if it happens.

I will use that if it happens.
ah blueblur please answer my question

ah blueblur please answer my question
Sorry, I completely glanced over your post.

My only source was a wiki page. After looking back at it, I noticed that it doesn't have any sources listed.
http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/The_Killer_%28Five_Nights_at_Freddy%27s%29

However, wouldn't it make more sense (horror game sense, not real sense) for the mascots to be controlled by the bodies shoved inside them?
Other than that, there isn't any reason for the mascots to attempt to kill people.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2014, 05:13:30 PM by blueblur121 »

Other than that, there isn't any reason for the mascots to attempt to kill people.
there not trying to kill you idiot, they see as a skeleton without its costume and its aganst the rules for the skeleton to be out of the costume.

there not trying to kill you idiot, they see as a skeleton without its costume and its aganst the rules for the skeleton to be out of the costume.
That's just what the previous gaurd said. If everyone in the game was correct, then it actually WAS the employee who stuffed those five kids into the mascots.

You're trying to argue that the machines actually killed those five kids, but that doesn't make sense because why would they do that? Obviously these things that you are supposed to sing to are not supposed to be inside a robotic exoskeleton.

What I'm trying to say, is that the machines are actually trying to kill you. Stuffing you into the exoskeleton is just what happens after. They are trying to kill you because some other employee killed them in the first place and stuffed them inside of the machines. As a result they seek revenge from employees at Freddy's
« Last Edit: August 27, 2014, 06:13:27 PM by blueblur121 »

there not trying to kill you idiot, they see as a skeleton without its costume and its aganst the rules for the skeleton to be out of the costume.
Actually, that's only the interpretation of the previous guard. It seems like on night five Freddy could be rewinding it for the next guard. It looks like the animatronics are trying to make the security guard feel safe with the interpretation of events by the previous guard who might have been the guard more than a week ago. The amount of weeks could range from two to whenever the pizzeria had the bite of '87.


That's just what the previous gaurd said. If everyone in the game was correct, then it actually WAS the employee who stuffed those five kids into the mascots.
where the hell is he implying everyone in the game is correct?
However, wouldn't it make more sense (horror game sense, not real sense) for the mascots to be controlled by the bodies shoved inside them?
no, not at all.
Other than that, there isn't any reason for the mascots to attempt to kill people.
they're not trying to kill you, they're trying to stuff you into a suit. also, the previous security guard says this;

Quote
"Uh, now concerning your safety: the only real risk to you as a night watchman here, if any, is the fact that these characters, uh, if they happen to see you after hours, probably won't recognize you as a person. They'll - They'll most likely see you as a metal endoskeleton without its costume on. Now, since that's against the rules here at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza they'll probably try to uh... forcefully stuff you inside a Freddy Fazbear suit.
Um, now that wouldn't be so bad if the suits themselves weren't filled with cross-beams, wiring, and animatronic devices, especially around the facial area, so you can imagine how having your head forcefully pressed inside one of those could cause a bit of... discomfort... and death... Uh, the only parts of you that would likely see the light of day again would be your eyeballs and teeth that would pop out the front of the mask. Yeah, they don't tell you these things when you sign up."
so while they're trying to stuff you into a suit, you're pretty much going to get mutilated, while for children it may end up worse.

also, back to this quote;

That's just what the previous gaurd said. If everyone in the game was correct, then it actually WAS the employee who stuffed those five kids into the mascots.
again, why are you immediately going to this when he isn't even saying that. The phone guy has more experience with the animatronics himself than the police, most likely. the police just needed someone to blame so they wouldn't seem crazy having a paper that's going "police arrest animatronics for slaughtering five children" so they found the one unlucky guy to assume was the murderer.


there's also NOTHING that i've found so far that points to an employee being the murderer if not a random guy