Author Topic: Furdle & Thorfin25 - "Server lagging? Time to permaban half the server!"  (Read 30102 times)

I wouldn't be surprised if they were in their server alone snickering at our posts because they think they're still right

I don't give a stuff if anybody agrees with me, I'm stating the banning system. The host doesn't require us to put in a reason, and wants them to be permanent during the development phase of builds. Therefor I don't have to take the time to write a reason, I don't have to state why I ban people. Sure on other servers like TBD's I'm not going to go around banning everybody. I'm going to follow his banning system.
And Aoki, you were banned by Facebot for w/e reason. If you feel it's unjustified you'll have to talk to himher.

I don't give a stuff if anybody agrees with me,
Probably cause they don't
I'm stating the banning system. The host doesn't require us to put in a reason, and wants them to be permanent during the development phase of builds. Therefor I don't have to take the time to write a reason, I don't have to state why I ban people. Sure on other servers like TBD's I'm not going to go around banning everybody. I'm going to follow his banning system.
You realize we're talking about the server in general and not only you right?

I wouldn't be surprised if they were in their server alone snickering at our posts because they think they're still right
Oh, I'm almost certain they are. It's perfectly in character, and apparently they already were.

I don't give a stuff if anybody agrees with me
Then bug off already. Stop posting stupid stuff.

thorfin and furdle confirmed problematic egomaniacs

Therefor I don't have to take the time to write a reason,
If you had taken the three seconds to put in a ban reason such as "banned for inactivity; will be lifted on opening day," you would have saved the time you're using right now for damage control.


how come the blf handicaps hang all in the most handicapped clan?

If you had taken the three seconds to put in a ban reason such as "banned for inactivity; will be lifted on opening day," you would have saved the time you're using right now for damage control.

maybe they're not productive enough to do that

apparently they already were
"They" Furdle and non-admins
Then bug off already. Stop posting stupid stuff.
You're literally bitching about the banning system. So you're saying instead of trying to justify the banning system, which I already have, I should bug off and let you insult someone I consider a friend? Taboo, please
Stop posting stupid stuff.

thorfin and furdle confirmed problematic egomaniacs
I don't care about my ego, Furdle is big on his ego though.
If you had taken the three seconds to put in a ban reason such as "banned for inactivity; will be lifted on opening day," you would have saved the time you're using right now for damage control.
It's not required, therefor I don't have to. And I'd rather spend those "three seconds" building.

So you're saying instead of trying to justify the banning system
I thought you didn't care what other people thought. You should really make up your mind.

You're literally bitching about the banning system. So you're saying instead of trying to justify the banning system, which I already have, I should bug off and let you insult someone I consider a friend? Taboo, please
No he wasn't?
Stop taking everything out of context.
It's not required, therefor I don't have to. And I'd rather spend those "three seconds" building.
"Oh no, I wasted 3 seconds to ban someone! I could have placed a brick in that amount of time!"
Please.

I'd rather spend those "three seconds" building.
If building is so important to you, then you should stop posting here and get building.

And I'd rather spend those "three seconds" building.

you're obviously not a good admin if you don't know that the text in that little box with the ban reason is the exact same when you go to ban another person

this is literally the best solution to your problem

Instead of stating no ban reason why not have a default
"Banned for doing jack richard when we're done you'll be unbanned"
People will know why and you can literally just copypaste it right now
You're making it harder for people to understand their bans, when you can take about 10 seconds to make a default ban reason

Instead of stating no ban reason why not have a default
"Banned for doing jack richard when we're done you'll be unbanned"
People will know why and you can literally just copypaste it right now
You're making it harder for people to understand their bans, when you can take about 10 seconds to make a default ban reason
"But I could be building in those 10 seconds! Now let me take a few minutes to type up a reply to make you seem wrong!"