Author Topic: (no hate replies please) i have a crush on my straight friend  (Read 27285 times)

saying this doesn't magically make it not offensive
I didn't really think what i wrote was offensive at all, and i don't know why anyone would it take it wrongly
I was really trying hard not to use the word, buts its really because of liberals, not that its a bad thing(i dont want to start stuff with anyone who is one) its just something that the left has brought into american culture

the only thing i found offensive was that you think its a choice

then again i also skimmed it all

the only thing i found offensive was that you think its a choice

then again i also skimmed it all

noprobably no? I've never really researched that but it doesn't make any real sense unless he got raped or manhandled, the mind doesn't pull stuff out and randomly make it into other stuff
I've never been raped or manhandled, but I'm still physically attracted to men. Besides, the mind is based off of your genetics, which are yours from birth. If you ever decide to do some actual research on the subject of genetics, you'll see that genes can randomly mutate when offspring are born.
Even if homoloveuality didn't come from genetic mutation, then it most likely came from it being a "female" loveuality that was transmitted to a male. Our genes and chromosomes are so complex that one small change can have amazing consequences.
the only reason that gay people could not have a choice is if some idiot decided he wanted to have love with men and altered his genes, but then had love with a woman making his children have more of a tendency to be gay

buts thats loving unlikely because of how hard it would be to create and give away a gay gene even if you didn't like females,  if you still feel loveual attraction for females its seriously unlikely
I'll repeat myself for clarity. You can't change your genes any more than you can change your blood type. The genes you get are decided the moment your father's sperm touches your mother's egg.
idk, i think the reason gay people start being gay is because they see other social tendencies and want to be like that to express themselves, but thats just because every other reason i've seen i've ruled out, so its just a guess but doesn't seem to really have anything against it
This tells me that you're just going to dismiss my argument, because it doesn't agree with your preconceived reality.
also no offense to gays or anything (I probably should say that because weird ass social rules) I'm just saying it doesn't happen when your below the age of like 15 or 16 when you actually finish puberty and can decide stuff without hormones getting in the way
Again, wrong. Guys and girls go through puberty until at least the age of 18. Some guys even go through it until the age of 24. It isn't abnormal. In fact, it is a common experience for some pipsqueak in high school to turn into some tall hunk of a man after college.
oops i accidentally wrote a research paper on gays stuff
This isn't a research paper at all. In fact, there is so little research in this post that I'm tempted to say that it is less than zero. I'm not sure how that is possible, but that is what I want to say.

tl;dr: Go back under your rock and leave things you don't know about well enough alone.

This isn't a research paper at all. In fact, there is so little research in this post that I'm tempted to say that it is less than zero. I'm not sure how that is possible, but that is what I want to say.

I would have given him a sliver of merit, but then I saw he was 14 and then I threw it out. I assumed he was maybe in college or something, but it's obvious that he wrote some one or two page essay on his close-minded view that his teacher probably thought, "Wow okay this has no data at all." Besides, "I wrote research on this" has little merit on its own. I could be writing about aliens and said "I WROTE A RESEARCH THING" and expect people to beleive me.

Hey Judge, I'm curious: what's your favorite and least favorite food?
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 06:40:14 PM by ShadowsfeaR »

what
population control

do you not see, like, any correlation with all of our population tendencies and the "rise of the gays"?

evolution doesnt work like that though
the better something is at having love the more of them there will be
being really, really good at love doesn't make evolution start backpedaling or whatever

unless im wrong in which case nevermind

population control

do you not see, like, any correlation with all of our population tendencies and the "rise of the gays"?
it's just that there are more people coming out of the closet
there's always been lots of gays

HOLY forget ITS DOORMAN

i am ok with lots of people being homoloveual
more women for me. ill take it any day

do you not see, like, any correlation with all of our population tendencies and the "rise of the gays"?
that's at least as laughable as what judge is saying


HOLY forget ITS DOORMAN

evolution doesnt work like that though
the better something is at having love the more of them there will be
being really, really good at love doesn't make evolution start backpedaling or whatever

unless im wrong in which case nevermind
Homoloveuality has existed since the dawn of civilization and quite reasonably before then as well. There are records of ancient Greeks and Romans participating in homoloveual activities. Here is a lazy reference for you.

It has benefited society in a wide variety of ways over the millennia. It ranges from resource conservation (less children produced leads to less food consumed), to child rearing (no children to take care of so the gay man can help his sisters/brothers with their children), even to cultural advancements (i.e. artwork).

Also, homoloveuality doesn't prevent a man from having children of his own. I've considered teaming up with a woman to have children of my own. I'm not, because there are better ways now-a-days. However, in the past it was not so easy. So for a man to have his own family, he would have to get with a woman, even if he was gay (which is far from impossible).

Homoloveuality isn't the refusal of have relations with a woman (although it sometimes does seem that way lol). It is the tendency for one to be attracted to the same love. In fact, there is a thing called the Kinsey scale that everyone sits somewhere on in relation to their loveuality. I would say I'm a five, but that is because I've met only a few women I was actually attracted to.

I've never been raped or manhandled, but I'm still physically attracted to men. Besides, the mind is based off of your genetics, which are yours from birth. If you ever decide to do some actual research on the subject of genetics, you'll see that genes can randomly mutate when offspring are born.

you loving change a little bit
you see like eye color, slight mind differences, maybe double jointedness
you dont see a loving change that changes everything that earth has been working for as long as any non-aloveual being has been around

Even if homoloveuality didn't come from genetic mutation, then it most likely came from it being a "female" loveuality that was transmitted to a male. Our genes and chromosomes are so complex that one small change can have amazing consequences.
why would this happen on such a large scale? why do I not see other animals, say, monkeys, make huge differences to their life styles and change how they act and attribute to how the other monkeys world works. Humans have been here for like what, 300k years, im not even really sure but all I know is that they're such a young species that thats an insane thing to think their genetics just randomly changed and just happened to be such a thing as a gay gene
I'll repeat myself for clarity. You can't change your genes any more than you can change your blood type.
this was wrong actually, its would actually have to be a mutation
still dont think its genetics though, just the human mind
This tells me that you're just going to dismiss my argument, because it doesn't agree with your preconceived reality.
by god, are you thick? no seriously, are you loving inbred to a godamn point or what
me, and other people, rule things out because evidence is given against them, not because they create a happy land where everything is right
go back to english class wow
Again, wrong. Guys and girls go through puberty until at least the age of 18. Some guys even go through it until the age of 24. It isn't abnormal. In fact, it is a common experience for some pipsqueak in high school to turn into some tall hunk of a man after college.T
growth hormones and puberty are different lol
you stop growing at like 27
you stop puberty at around 16- 20
its a big range, i was just giving the lowest amount to show 12 isnt even close
This isn't a research paper at all. In fact, there is so little research in this post that I'm tempted to say that it is less than zero. I'm not sure how that is possible, but that is what I want to say.


holy christ is english your second language
i mean really, its a joke, you could probably tell that it was if you'd pull out all the spiked earplugs you've used to make sure no other ideas get in your head that might intercept with your gay lifestyle


tl;dr: Go back under your rock and leave things you don't know about well enough alone.
why does everyone say this? you cant comprehend NOR can you ever comprehend what we feel because its beyond you and normalness
jesus if you'd actually explain it a little maybe people would be able to understand why you think all that you do


I also dont understand why minorities act like this, people are continously making white straight men out at evil beings whos only job is to destroy all other races and loveualities, yet nothing explodes and it continoues to happens

but then, a straight man tries to explain or understnd a gay man, or a white man tries to to the same a black man, and the other side explodes with all sorts of stuff, its loving degrading and bullstuff and i dont why its like this(the rise of the gays? the end of the human race?)

i'm also done with this bullstuff, I'm getting tired of typing out paragraphs and doorman is the exact type of minority that i dont like, the loving over aggressive starfish. I've tried doing this elsewhere it never goes anywhere, people wonder why I increasingly hate gays and this is why, they just dont understand that new ideas can be formed and that other people are able to have a conversation of loveuality without immediately disgracing you and community, more or less, i think they're waaaay to aggressive about what they like
I would have given him a sliver of merit, but then I saw he was 14 and then I threw it out. I assumed he was maybe in college or something, but it's obvious that he wrote some one or two page essay on his close-minded view that his teacher probably thought, "Wow okay this has no data at all." Besides, "I wrote research on this" has little merit on its own. I could be writing about aliens and said "I WROTE A RESEARCH THING" and expect people to beleive me.


proving my point, over loving aggressive, i mean, apparently I'm able to make my own life long decisions right now, so shouldn't i be loving able to understand something as simple as loving males brown townly, orally, etc?


Hey Judge, I'm curious: what's your favorite and least favorite food?
I could really go for gay mans liver and soul atm, however, i despiiiise any fruit flavored wine, beer is a mans drink!
is it loving stereotypes or something? I really dont why you care

again, jesus
they'll just argue and argue, it doesn't even have to be a gay person, just someone who thinks any status of gay, they wont change I cant even attempt to make any of them think anyyy differently in any way shape or form, I'm not even going to attempt lol, so uh, bye doorman, nice to see your godamn back back

that's at least as laughable as what judge is saying
Quote
aggressive
Quote
unable to understand or tell others whyyy
Quote
aggressive
Quote
etc

I'm forgetin teln u man
is fukn tru

evolution doesnt work like that though
the better something is at having love the more of them there will be
being really, really good at love doesn't make evolution start backpedaling or whatever
unless im wrong in which case nevermind
evolution doesn't do anything on purpose, because it isn't a sentient being
any trait that ends up preventing someone from reproducing (which is also effect of not surviving) will disappear. but not because it gets removed, simply because there's no way for it to be passed on in the first place
so if the ability to reproduce too much ends up preventing reproduction (which it can), then a trait that slows it down could eventually become pretty common

but it takes a really long time. so artificial ways of dealing with overpopulation are much better
they wont change I cant even attempt to make any of them think anyyy differently in any way shape or form, I'm not even going to attempt lol, so uh, bye doorman, nice to see your godamn back back
I am very sorry that I won't listen to you tell me I chose to like guys
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 07:39:55 PM by Foxscotch »