Author Topic: #gamergate megathread  (Read 140546 times)

The IA quote from the other voocaroo was glorious.

The one I just posted? Which one?

The one I just posted? Which one?

The one before.
Withy the shekels.




I think he's actually posting pictures of himself on his new twitter lol

He posted a vocaroo confirming its him.

it's the same vocaroo every time
I'm pretty sure it's edited

it sounds like at least part of it is while he's playing a game


 You know, I never really understood how you can link 'feminism' with 'social justice' surely it started out for equality, but right now it's only about female rights and only them, they don't seek equality any more that much, they just seek to have more rights than males with all this stuff they do.

 So really now, Social Justice is about equality, how could one consider something literally called 'feminism' as a movement for equality, it clearly shows that it's based around the female gender with it's name, by definition it surely states that it's about men and women's equal rights, but it has been too easily taken over by people who just want to have the female gender rule over the male gender, if you seriously wanted equality though-- why the hell not call feminism, equalism..!

 I consider myself to follow Social Justice, but in the right way, Feminism is clearly mostly in the wrong here, but I won't go calling you stufflords-- tell you to police your tone, since that's not stuff that people who actually follow Social Justice do, we don't defend people who are clearly in the wrong and have absolutely no right to do this type of stuff to you, also those phrases I mentioned earlier are something which comes from the people you label as Social Justice Warriors and Radical Feminists that say that.

You know, I never really understood how you can link 'feminism' with 'social justice' surely it started out for equality, but right now it's only about female rights and only them, they don't seek equality any more that much, they just seek to have more rights than males with all this stuff they do.

 So really now, Social Justice is about equality, how could one consider something literally called 'feminism' as a movement for equality, it clearly shows that it's based around the female gender with it's name, by definition it surely states that it's about men and women's equal rights, but it has been too easily taken over by people who just want to have the female gender rule over the male gender, if you seriously wanted equality though-- why the hell not call feminism, equalism..!

 I consider myself to follow Social Justice, but in the right way, Feminism is clearly mostly in the wrong here, but I won't go calling you stufflords-- tell you to police your tone, since that's not stuff that people who actually follow Social Justice do, we don't defend people who are clearly in the wrong and have absolutely no right to do this type of stuff to you, also those phrases I mentioned earlier are something which comes from the people you label as Social Justice Warriors and Radical Feminists that say that.

Gamergate doesn't have anything to do with SJW or feminism, people just forced themselves into it and tried really hard to try to make it about those issues.

forget internet aristocrat tbh. never cared for radicals anyway.

forget internet aristocrat tbh. never cared for radicals anyway.
if you think IA is a radical you have no idea

if you think IA is a radical you have no idea
he literally said in his final message that he was but alright

i dont mean radical left by the way i mean just radical in what he believes in. for gamergate and other stuff.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2014, 01:56:20 PM by Kimon² »

give this a good listen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aamP8k_Dg5w

also internet aristocrat quoted Riddler at the end of his message so there's that

he literally said in his final message that he was but alright

i dont mean radical left by the way i mean just radical in what he believes in. for gamergate and other stuff.
The only thing I can see here is him saying he picks a yes or no side and doesn't hover in the middle. and I just looked up the definition of radical here, "advocating or based on thorough or complete political or social reform; representing or supporting an extreme section of a political party." and I'm not entirely sure how to interpret that, but I would think that the "extreme sections" of gamergate would be the people who make death threats and stuff, and he certainly does not represent that.

Quoting Riddler is definitely an odd choice, but he sees gamergate as a war that needs to be won. We were winning and now we're losing according to him, kinda like Riddler was sorta winning the war and then he started to lose ground.

idk this kinda seems like an "everybody loses one way or another" kind of deal