the monsanto monopoly is a very real thing, it's essentially already happening with corn and soy, but:
monsanto =/= gmo
monsanto may be the current face of gmo's at the time, but they're not the same. one is a process, and the other is a company.
That's literally the entire point I'm trying to prove here. The fact that an unethical, immoral corporation makes GMOs has no effect on how useful/safe they are.
"I know, let's charge people $10 for every litre of air they inhale!"
LOL, industrialized agriculture has
lowered the price of food for the consumer. The reason why Monsanto is controversial is because they put a burden on the producers, not the consumers. Learn your own controversy.
Here is a graph of real agriculture prices adjusted for inflation since 1900:

As you can see, since the green revolution around the 40s there's a clear negative trend in the price of food. The bumps in the 70s and 80s were because of the
1973 oil crCIA and resulting embargos by the OPEC, which raised the price of food by driving up transportation costs.