reported for gore (nsfw
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12

Author Topic: reported for gore (nsfw  (Read 10892 times)

Alternat¡ve

February 16, 2015, 03:48:29 PM
Quote from: Slab Bulkhead on February 16, 2015, 03:23:53 PM
What the forget? Are you crazy? you don't try the shoe on before you buy it? You are absolutely insane.
Websites like Footlocker, Eastbay etc. tell you if the shoe runs wide, runs large etc. so you know if the shoe would fit you well. You can also order in your own size so IDK what you are making a fuss about.

Ad Bot

Advertisement

Nonnel

February 16, 2015, 04:20:15 PM
Who are the idiots buying these now "rare" used shoes

KickFlow

February 16, 2015, 06:15:49 PM
Quote from: Aces on February 16, 2015, 03:45:48 PM
You fail to make any sort of point as to why sneaker resale is bad business, so the feeling is mutual.
Quote from: KickFlow on February 16, 2015, 03:35:58 PM
But 30 years. for 3k, and they haven't sold in months.

SeventhSandwich

February 17, 2015, 09:11:14 PM
Quote from: Aces on February 16, 2015, 03:45:48 PM
the amount averages at $128 per pair sold. Seems more than just regular buying and selling of regular shoes.
Can't argue with the data I suppose. However, it's important to take into consideration that the unit price of the shoes being bought/sold doesn't actually tell you about how much money people are making by 'trading' these things.

Rabbot32

February 17, 2015, 09:19:03 PM
You make my custom 200$ jackboots sob.

Alternat¡ve

February 17, 2015, 09:23:14 PM
Quote from: Rabbot32 on February 17, 2015, 09:19:03 PM
You make my custom 200$ jackboots sob.
You are creepy.

Rabbot32

February 17, 2015, 09:30:15 PM
Quote from: Alternat¡ve on February 17, 2015, 09:23:14 PM
You are creepy.
*Loud marching.*
You sir, are offensive.

Tayasaurus

February 17, 2015, 09:32:13 PM
I'm more of an endurance kinda of person. So everything i pretty much own is pretty rugged (except all my latex attire which i do not want getting dusty)

Benjamin Lopez

February 17, 2015, 09:51:49 PM
Those look trashy, and I don't understand why anyone would spend $350 on shoes unless you were going to collect them.
You can only wear them to a few places because they get forgeted up so easily, and they don't even last that long to begin with.

Strovbe

February 18, 2015, 04:33:51 PM
Quote from: Benjamin Lopez on February 17, 2015, 09:51:49 PM
Those look trashy, and I don't understand why anyone would spend $350 on shoes unless you were going to collect them.
You can only wear them to a few places because they get forgeted up so easily, and they don't even last that long to begin with.

SWAG IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN PAYING THE BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

§am§on

February 18, 2015, 04:34:38 PM
Quote from: Strovbe on February 18, 2015, 04:33:51 PM
SWAG IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN PAYING THE BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AHHH I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE CAPSING ABOUT!!!!!

bejacks

February 18, 2015, 04:45:23 PM

Strovbe

February 18, 2015, 04:46:24 PM
Quote from: §am§on on February 18, 2015, 04:34:38 PM
AHHH I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE CAPSING ABOUT!!!!!

IT'S CALLED EMPHASIS!!!!!!!!! ALSO I'M BEING SARCASTIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Epicduke

February 18, 2015, 05:04:15 PM
why does one need such a large picture of al gore

Aces

February 18, 2015, 05:06:28 PM
Quote from: KickFlow on February 16, 2015, 06:15:49 PM

Literally one instance.

Fact of the matter is the shoes were set at that price because those of the same kind were bought in that range.
And the whole 30 years thing is moot because they weren't on ebay for 30 years or maybe even a year.
Quote from: SeventhSandwich on February 17, 2015, 09:11:14 PM
Can't argue with the data I suppose. However, it's important to take into consideration that the unit price of the shoes being bought/sold doesn't actually tell you about how much money people are making by 'trading' these things.
but you can argue that there is at least a self-sustaining market, right?
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12
« previous next »