Steven Universe Megathread - The Discourse

[Kimon²]

>kimon's face when there is nudity on children's tv nowadays

i remember that time spongebob shoved his rooster in patrick's mouth on tv

I think what we've established here is that you are not normal. And argumentatively challenged.

"you arent normal" - person who draws rule 34

Again with your "OH THINK OF THE CHILDREN" argument. You are assuming that every kid out there will go blind if they see boobs before puberty. Plenty of kids growing up wanted to see Kim Possibles pear shaped body in the nude.

Nowadays with the stuff on TV kids are exposed to human anatomy more and more, stop acting like the body is so taboo.

if there's nothing more to this argument than "who cares if the kids see cartoon titties" then i have a feeling it's not gonna go much further than this

[Ad Bot]

[Frequency]

if there's nothing more to this argument than "who cares if the kids see cartoon titties" then i have a feeling it's not gonna go much further than this

A. if they see them they're more than likely looking for them
B. of course this argument isn't going to go anywhere because you're fighting a lost cause with nothing to back up your statements besides your opinion.

[hillkill]

kimon is the devine decision maker on things here guys. we can't do anything but stop looking at r34 research

[Alternat¡ve]

"you arent normal" - person who draws rule 34

if there's nothing more to this argument than "who cares if the kids see cartoon titties" then i have a feeling it's not gonna go much further than this

Your only arguments now are "wtf you like rule 34" instead of making any actual points.

[·::Kishgal::·]

i remember that time spongebob shoved his rooster in patrick's mouth on tv"

I don't know, you seem to think that the naked body is the embodiment of Satan, so what's it matter?

"you arent normal" - person who draws rule 34

Yes, correct. You're aloveual or something, apparently. Ergo, not normal.

Your only arguments now are "wtf you like rule 34" instead of making any actual points.

It's occurred to me that if this were Twitter, Kimon is the sort who would block everyone who disagrees with him, especially those who effectively prove him wrong. Instead he just settles for slinging stuff like an infant.

Assume that when he starts making attempts to insult you, you've won the argument.

[Kimon²]

Your only arguments now are "wtf you like rule 34" instead of making any actual points.

like i said, the argument isn't going anywhere if it's already devolved into "there's nothing wrong with r34 because..." and "there's something wrong with drawing research of a kid's show because...."

kimon is the devine decision maker on things here guys. we can't do anything but stop looking at r34 research

like i said, you can look at it all you want but im not gonna respect you.

A. if they see them they're more than likely looking for them
B. of course this argument isn't going to go anywhere because you're fighting a lost cause with nothing to back up your statements besides your opinion.

a. boy you are naive if you really believe that
b. me? arguing against other people's opinions with a conflicting opinion? me? a human being?

I don't know, you seem to think that the naked body is the embodiment of Satan, so what's it matter?

the naked body isn't researchographic in nature, but love on the other hand....

I don't know, you seem to think that the naked body is the embodiment of Satan, so what's it matter?
Yes, correct. You're aloveual or something, apparently. Ergo, not normal.

you got me!

Assume that when he starts making attempts to insult you, you've won the argument.

congratulations for winning an internet argument. you win the official Big richard trophy

[Alternat¡ve]

Kimons descent into madness

[Frequency]

a. boy you are naive if you really believe that
b. me? arguing against other people's opinions with a conflicting opinion? me? a human being?the naked body

A: resorting to calling me naive and not even telling me why gj
B: using being human as an excuse to act like an idiot when someone has a special interest. you're allowed to have another opinion and you're allowed to be a richard about it, but the latter is less preferable

Kimons descent into madness

[otto-san]

i can understand the idea that it can be shocking to kids considering the outlook on love in general in a lot of cultures (not trying to make sweeping, profound statements or anything by saying that)

i just personally don't agree with the idea of desiring the non-existence of something because it could be offensive. that just doesn't sit right with me, but i understand that some people are offended by things and i'm not going to fault them for it. it just doesn't make sense that something wholly, on its own, un-harmful in its nature and its implications shouldn't exist because of its potential to make someone uncomfortable. not to me at least.

now, if something exists exclusively unfailingly and flagrantly offensively in a manner which is undeniably rooted in legitimately problematic behaviour or intention, the perpetrator is protected, but i wouldn't stand by their decisions.

essentially this goes back to what i said before: as long as it's not hurting anyone in any legitimate manner, i probably won't have a problem with it. but i'm not going to fault someone for being offended by something, that's not my business.

blah blah blah internet blather and such. i don't care about winning anything, i just want to contribute something that can maybe help someone learn or understand something. doesn't matter so much to me that people agree, just that everyone can learn somethin nice u no

[Obliviongate20]

otto is like some sort of master of deceit
one moment he calls something a can of beans the next he's a supreme court lawyer

[Kimon²]

i can understand the idea that it can be shocking to kids considering the outlook on love in general in a lot of cultures (not trying to make sweeping, profound statements or anything by saying that)

i just personally don't agree with the idea of desiring the non-existence of something because it could be offensive. that just doesn't sit right with me, but i understand that some people are offended by things and i'm not going to fault them for it. it just doesn't make sense that something wholly, on its own, un-harmful in its nature and its implications shouldn't exist because of its potential to make someone uncomfortable. not to me at least.

now, if something exists exclusively unfailingly and flagrantly offensively in a manner which is undeniably rooted in legitimately problematic behaviour or intention, the perpetrator is protected, but i wouldn't stand by their decisions.

essentially this goes back to what i said before: as long as it's not hurting anyone in any legitimate manner, i probably won't have a problem with it. but i'm not going to fault someone for being offended by something, that's not my business.

blah blah blah internet blather and such. i don't care about winning anything, i just want to contribute something that can maybe help someone learn or understand something. doesn't matter so much to me that people agree, just that everyone can learn somethin nice u no

fair enough. im not gonna respond to any posts about this argument anymore so dont waste your time writing a long ass post
(referring to other people not u otto)

[Frequency]

can't pull things out of your ass when the well's run dry, eh?

[IkeTheGeneric]

man, kimon got BTFO

[otto-san]

lol there's not really any reason to antagonise him

[·::Kishgal::·]

can't pull things out of your ass when the well's run dry, eh?

OK THAT'S ACTUALLY REALLY GROSS WOW