Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff

[kahnuu]

you can believe what you want, sending a pic was 100% in her control

i'm waiting on that evidence fam

[Ad Bot]

[Jubel]

i'm waiting on that evidence fam

you just want to see bubbagum jailbait you perv

[kahnuu]

you just want to see bubbagum jailbait you perv

I want to see where she says she is 19.

[Foxscotch]

right so if she didn't want stuff like this to happen she shouldn't have sent the pic as you perfectly put "gone outside in the first place"
poor brown townogy

sending the pic did not cause him to share it. she had no idea that was going to happen. so... she didn't do anything wrong, and it's not her fault in any conceivable way. especially since you were just talking about how it's normal to share nudes

No it's definitely her fault in the matter too, you shouldn't be doing that stuff regardless if it's "what everyone else is doing".

is that what your parents told you?

[Ducky duck]

If the legal age of consent in some states in the US are different (PA is 16) does that mean the same for research?

[Foxscotch]

If the legal age of consent in some states in the US are different (PA is 16) does that mean the same for research?

no, because child research is federally illegal. lewd pictures of anyone under 18 is illegal

[Ducky duck]

 oh rip

[DJ Charizard]

That's uncontrollable. If a rape is forced by some person, it has no relevance to what the person is wearing because they're making their way for the packages no matter what.

Taking a photo of yourself and sending it is a different issue. While absolutely a person can be pressured into doing it, it's a should be a lot simpler to say no to the situation and (metaphorically) walk away. You can't say no to someone who's already thrusting their hand down your pants without permission, or preparation for that matter.

I was poking at the people that say that she's in the wrong for sending the picture if she didnt want it to get spread.

You took it way too literal.

[Khaz°]

sending the pic did not cause him to share it. she had no idea that was going to happen. so... she didn't do anything wrong, and it's not her fault in any conceivable way. especially since you were just talking about how it's normal to share nudesis that what your parents told you?

i said it was normal

i never said that problems don't arise from sending them
her picture being spread was still 100% in her control. should have known better

[sir dooble]

right so if she didn't want stuff like this to happen she shouldn't have sent the pic as you perfectly put "gone outside in the first place"

poor brown townogy

It was an abuse of her trust.

Bubba may have been nervous about it, but she trusted him with the picture.
She said herself that she thought he liked her. It was an intimate thing based on trust.

Nick abused her trust and shared the pictures. That is not Bubbas fault.
She may have been naive to trust Nick, but it doesn't make her in the wrong for trusting a person.


At any rate, Bubba took a risk. Yes, she shouldn't have, but hindsight is a bitch.
There's no way that sending an intimate picture of yourself to a trusted person is as bad an action as sharing those pictures without permission.

ummmm nick knew that the girl was 16 and asked for underwear pic. is fact

I think we are crossing our subjects. In that topic I was referring to the situation regarding Tills claiming to be 19 yet being 15.

[Jubel]

I want to see where she says she is 19.

oh my god pay-a-loving-tention it wasnt bubbagum that said she was 19. Your hate boner for nick is way too strong.
Also, I told a friend over the phone that I was really a 25 year old girl. How can I possibly provide evidence for that? Replace "phone" with any sort of medium that isnt text based, such as Skype, Teamspeak, or Facetime. There isn't always a paper trail of evidence you idiot, and you're not entitled to it either.

sending the pic did not cause him to share it. she had no idea that was going to happen. so... she didn't do anything wrong, and it's not her fault in any conceivable way. especially since you were just talking about how it's normal to share nudesis that what your parents told you?

I've given my fair share of naked but I always knew in the back of my head that their could be consequences of giving them to other people, not everyone is as trustworthy as their online facade appears to be. Did I say no? No. But with that I lose any innocence after I send them and they get lose.

Is the person who shared them an absolute cunt? Absolutely, but for anyone to share any photos with anyone whom they already had doubts about isn't the smartest thing to do, and is completely avoidable.

I was poking at the people that say that she's in the wrong for sending the picture if she didnt want it to get spread.

There are consequences for every action. Is she wrong in a moral regard? Maybe, (in my mind not really).
Is it the wrong thing to do regardless? Kind of yeah, sharing photos of yourself when you're not of age isn't really a great thing to do. Lots of people are guilty of it, but it's not right.

And as Dooble said, hindsight is like, 20/20.

[Bloody Mary]

i said it was normal

i never said that problems don't arise from sending them
her picture being spread was still 100% in her control. should have known better

How about instead of blaming the person who took the picture, you blame the person who spread it around behind her back? You're acting as if by sending the picture, she endorsed its distribution. While sending risque pictures of yourself is questionable, secretly distributing the personal pictures of others is far worse.

[DJ Charizard]

snip

Again, you completely missed my point.

and:

You took it way too literal.

[Foxscotch]

her picture being spread was still 100% in her control. should have known better

only in the sense that she could have chosen not to send it. would you say someone was at fault if they got an STD from someone who didn't tell them they had an STD? ...probably, lol
I'm trying to put it into a context that would make you understand how ridiculous it is that you feel this way

let's say someone bought a car from craigslist, and the seller followed them to their house and killed them in their sleep. is it their fault because they bought the car from someone on craigslist?

[Damp]

(he was 18 at time and I was 16, never lied about my age on here so there's no excuse)

you don't have to feel guilty in this situation at all, you were a minor

nick seriously