i can snark if i want, stuff dude you dont know how someone's day went
You having a bad day doesn't give you the right to be an ass
arguing about a different topic that wasnt mentioned before
Hmm
Close, but not quite
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawmanA strawman is misrepresenting the opponent's arguments, not bringing up something off topic.
But no one is doing either of those, so gg either way.
ur doing it again. that wasnt what i meant to say with that sentence.
Excuse me, "I'm doing it again"?
I'm directly addressing the words you typed on the page.
It's not my fault if you typed the wrong words
it was that they wrongly set up the calculation when they removed the coinflip
The equation isn't wrong though.
It explicitly says "
Win Rate" and it's exactly what it is: the percentage of your games that were
wins.
If you want
another statistic in addition, then sure, why not? I think adding "tie rate" and "loss rate" would be good. But don't go crying that the current one is wrong, because it isn't; it's exactly what it says it is.
but forget it dude i really dont want to talk game design with people that say "this sentence is laughable" like god dam that aint snarky, thats just straight up being a rooster.
Hey, you started the snark.
I called it laughable because it wasn't just something like an opinion I disagree with. It was a factually incorrect statement
Poll