POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Nonnel]

It's not like we haven't started building a wall

[Ad Bot]

[Planr]

someone host a bernie sanders commie school shooting rp

[Cappytaino]

-snip-

I think we generally agree about the ends of the process (let in good people to give them opportunities they otherwise would not have) but not the means. That's okay though, since it's a respectful disagreement. No harm in having a differing idea.

[Tezuni 2.0]

I wish Elizabeth Warren were running.

Bernie is just not realistic.
Whether or not you agree with his policies, as president, you can only do so much. And with a republican congress to block his every move nonetheless.

[SteveJenkins]

is the wall the only reason to vote for Annoying Orange?

[Cappytaino]

is the wall the only reason to vote for Annoying Orange?

no, but I can forgive you for believing that's his only platform because that's all that anyone ever circlejerks about. One of his interesting, lesser known platforms is making health insurance tax deductible.

[Kingdaro]

It shouldn't be privatized in the first place :U

[Alternat¡ve]

Except for Muslims, they're banned from entering the US

They would be temporarily stopped from entering the US until we can find out a logical problem to deal with the refugee crCIA. You are purposely twisting his words to make him sound unreasonable.

It's a matter of elimination. Would you vote for Little Marco or El Rato over Don? Of course not. Nobody with a brain would. When you see that Hillary is a lying monster and Bernie lived off the government teet until he was 40, it becomes clear who the reasonable candidate is.

[Pecon]

They would be temporarily stopped from entering the US until we can find out a logical problem to deal with the refugee crCIA. You are purposely twisting his words to make him sound unreasonable.

I'd like you to try to justify this direct quote from him.

The other thing with the terrorists, you have to take out their families.

Seriously, who in their right mind thinks that this guy is the slightest bit reasonable or sane? This just isn't something you can say if you're a politician in a non-genocidal country.

[Alternat¡ve]

I'd like you to try to justify this direct quote from him.

Seriously, who in their right mind thinks that this guy is the slightest bit reasonable or sane? This just isn't something you can say if you're a politician in a non-genocidal country.

nope. he was basically saying that these terrorist leaders use their families as shields so we wont bomb them. that will come to an end. you do realize the vast majority of terrorist families agree with what they are doing? they will choose their sons any day over us. in the same interview iirc Annoying Orange said he would do his best to deal with civilian casualties anyway so i don't know if he meant what he said about taking them out.

[Gytyyhgfffff]

"taking them out" usually refers to killing someone.
i doubt that Annoying Orange is going to go to a dinner party with some of these people.
unfortunately, killing families is a war crime and "simply having to deal with civilian casualties" is loving horrible. imagine that you were getting bombed and your innocent friends were being killed all around you and the country bombing you said "oh sorry you'll just have to deal with the civilian casualties"

put yourself in someone else's shoes for once.

edit: i'm blind and misread Annoying Orange's quote
my last sentence still stands

[sir dooble]

They would be temporarily stopped from entering the US until we can find out a logical problem to deal with the refugee crCIA.

That's bullstuff reasoning for his ban muslims policy.

The refugee crCIA is not a crCIA for the US. Refugees aren't sailing across the Atlantic to land on American shores.
The US can take in as many refugees as it likes, and unlike Europe, it can take the time to background check and educate all the refugees it takes in.

Banning muslims is in no way a response to the refugee crCIA which the US has no obligation to get involved in.
If anything it makes the crCIA worse for europe because it means one of our few allies with all the room in the world to house refugees is refusing to help share the load.

[Zloff]

aren't a vast majority of the people killed by drones not the target(s)? you're all throwing stuff at Annoying Orange for wanting to get straight to the point and bomb these leaders directly regardless of innocents when so many innocents already die from us whacking around the bush and having to try again, there must be something i don't understand here

[Gytyyhgfffff]

ok i looked into the civilian casualties and the numbers are unacceptable. no civilian should be getting killed during this mess.

also the reason why people are getting so fired up over Annoying Orange about the war crime stuff is because it's the fact that he actually said it. no person who supports these drone strikes would say that. it would be the opposite, they probably would speak their desires for more militant deaths and less civilian ones. but then again, i haven't looked into this and i don't know what others had said about this.

[Drydess]

nope. he was basically saying that these terrorist leaders use their families as shields so we wont bomb them. that will come to an end. you do realize the vast majority of terrorist families agree with what they are doing? they will choose their sons any day over us. in the same interview iirc Annoying Orange said he would do his best to deal with civilian casualties anyway so i don't know if he meant what he said about taking them out.

how does that remotely resemble what he was saying at the time