POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Anthony Fuckstick]

don't get all uppity, i'm stupid too. same with red

Love you too

[Ad Bot]

[Poliwhirl]

Well we can take this thread as an example https://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=301160.msg9189180#msg9189180

Where you talk down to everyone like a cunt, deny facts that are right in your face, then immediately ignore it when it turns out everyone is against you on it

well we can take THIS thread as an example, actually.

Where you talk down to everyone like a cunt

Thats funny coming from the autist with a superiority complex

Don't pretend like you are anything more than an SJW.

It's like that went right over your head.

You're telling me you've never said stupid stuff like that in private?

It's important to remember that everything you say is a joke

deny facts that are right in your face

I don't see how grabbing someone by the pusillanimous individual will translate into laws though

then immediately ignore it when it turns out everyone is against you on it

see: everyone disagreeing with you and you providing nothing of substance in response

[otto-san]

You're telling me you've never said stupid stuff like that in private?

no

[beachbum111111]

you providing nothing of substance in response

Nice cherrypicking handicap

Just because someone has a personal view on something doesn't mean they will try to enforce it through the law. Thats like saying if someone is a devout christian that got elected that they will gas all atheists and muslims.

Except Riddlers promises and policy had to directly do with Jews. And Churchill wasn't fond of Jews either http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/world/europe/11iht-winston.4873300.html?_r=0

see: everyone disagreeing with yo

And yes all of 2 people are arguing with me and disagreeing with me. Don't forget, you're a subhuman so you don't count as a person in the scenario (or any scenario for that matter)

no

Don't lie to me boy

[otto-san]

Don't lie to me boy

i never say stupid things sorry boss

[beachbum111111]

i never make stupid jokes

Life must be depressing

[Poliwhirl]

Nice cherrypicking handicap

bringing up winston churchill even though it was completely irrelevant is not "substance" and the first sentence is you making a claim that has already been disputed

And yes all of 2 people are arguing with me and disagreeing with me. Don't forget, you're a subhuman so you don't count as a person in the scenario (or any scenario for that matter)

are you really wondering why people aren't finding you agreeable? i'm assuming you know how much of an unreasonable ass you're being, or else i'd have to say you're delusional.

[beachbum111111]

bringing up winston churchill even though it was completely irrelevant is not "substance" and the first sentence is you making a claim that has already been disputedare you really wondering why people aren't finding you agreeable?

Except the other person brought up loving Riddler so yes Churchill is relevant. It's like you don't know how to read.

[Poliwhirl]

Except the other person brought up loving Riddler so yes Churchill is relevant. It's like you don't know how to read.

please explain why you needed to bring up churchill even though the mentioning of Riddler was a loose metaphor used to prove a point.

i like how you accentuate every single one of your responses by adding an insult to the end of them. really makes you seem like you're in the right here.

[beachbum111111]

please explain why you needed to bring up churchill even though the mentioning of Riddler was a loose metaphor used to prove a point.

He used someone from history to prove a point so I did the same thing. I don't see what's so difficult to comprehend here.

i like how you accentuate every single one of your responses by adding an insult to the end of them. really makes you seem like you're in the right here.

Unlike you in the last thread where you made NO points and just stuff on people nonstop

[Poliwhirl]

He used someone in history to prove a point so I did the same thing. I don't see what's so difficult to comprehend here.

its difficult to comprehend because you literally didn't make a point. that phrase had 0 argumentative substance, let alone relevance. you just stated an unrelated fact because they were also a person from that time period. might as well have prefaced it by saying "Unrelated fun fact:"

[beachbum111111]

its difficult to comprehend because you literally didn't make a point. that phrase had 0 argumentative substance, let alone relevance. you just stated an unrelated fact because they were also a person from that time period. might as well have prefaced it by saying "Unrelated fun fact:"

All right I'll break it down for you; Churchill didn't like Jews but it didn't translate into policy.

[Poliwhirl]

All right I'll break it down for you; Churchill didn't like Jews but it didn't translate into policy.

fair enough, but next time don't use vague phrasing and assume everyone is on the same train of thought as you. saying "churchill didn't like the jews" by itself doesn't carry much relevance, but your new statement makes sense because it's actually put into context of the argument.

[IkeTheGeneric]

All right I'll break it down for you; Churchill didn't like Jews but it didn't translate into policy.

honestly nobody likes the jews tho

[beachbum111111]

fair enough, but next time don't use vague phrasing and assume everyone is on the same train of thought as you. saying "churchill didn't like the jews" by itself doesn't carry much relevance, but your new statement makes sense because it's actually put into context of the argument.

Alright fair enough. I'm complete stuff at articulating what im trying to say.