so why would you want to use the exact same vehicle to protect yourself against them? armored military vehicles are totally unnecessary; armored police cruisers or vans should be enough.
Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP; /ˈɛmræp/ EM-rap) is a term for United States military vehicles produced as part of the MRAP program that are designed specifically to withstand improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and ambushes.
I'm going to highlight a few points here from the first sentence of the wikipedia definition.
improvised explosive device (IED)
Commonly used by insurgency and irregular forces (see: """"protestors"""") and serve the same purpose and are functionally identical to mines
ambushes
see: """"protestors""""
What I'm trying to say is that MRAP's a vehicle developed for coin operations in the middle east, can serve a similar purpose here in the states because it was designed for an environment where lots of bystanders are present and the combatants can blend in and threats arent exactly clear, something you see at a lot of these "protests".
Another point to add is that police departments want armored vehicles regardless. Would you rather have them spend money on something like a
lenco bear which i admit would serve the same purpose as a DoD built MRAP, but it costs money to the local department, and have the DoD "waste" the money because they didn't find a use for the surplus MRAPs?