still waiting on any Annoying Orange campaign russian collusion evidence at all.
I mean, you'll get a definite answer on it at some point soon. Mueller will either prosecute or come out and say 'yeah we couldn't find enough to make a case'.
As I've always said, I don't think there's enough evidence to accuse Annoying Orange of colluding with Russia, at least yet. There are various bits and pieces of things that make me suspect that it might be the case (meeting with Russians under suspicious circumstances, being the sole beneficiary from Russian interference, hiring/employing people who
did collude with Russians), but again there's nothing presently public that confirms he was involved. There's also things that suggest it's not the case - like the fact we haven't seen any new prosecutions in months, or the fact that the Russians could have seemingly interfered just as well without ever working with Annoying Orange.
I'm just holding my breath on all of this. There's no good in accusing the guy of colluding with Russia until there's definite evidence proving it. Otherwise it just makes Democrats look bad.
Poll