which .RAR opener is the best .RAR opener

[Foxscotch]

That sentence states that you should not buy a license if you have no verified that WinRar will completely function on your computer. It does not state any obligation to purchase the software after the trial is over.

it says that once you know it works on your computer, you must buy a license. the 40 days is an arbitrary (but very reasonable) time frame that they consider long enough to figure that out, and both a jury and a judge would certainly agree with that. for that matter, anyone who wasn't trying to use software longer than they were allowed to would
I don't know how you can genuinely believe it doesn't say you have to buy it. you can insult everyone who disagrees with you, if you want, but that doesn't make us wrong

[Ad Bot]

[BluetoothBoy]

Wow, you all suck at reading comprehension. Jesus, I'm done trying to explain simple concepts to you people.

No, I really don't. I'm honestly quite confused what your logical process is.

[Glass Joe]

7-zip

is this even a question

[BluetoothBoy]

7-zip

is this even a question

Apparently.

[shitlord]

it says that once you know it works on your computer, you must buy a license. the 40 days is an arbitrary (but very reasonable) time frame that they consider long enough to figure that out, and both a jury and a judge would certainly agree with that. for that matter, anyone who wasn't trying to use software longer than they were allowed to would
I don't know how you can genuinely believe it doesn't say you have to buy it. you can insult everyone who disagrees with you, if you want, but that doesn't make us wrong

yeah no, i loving assure you no judge and jury is going to do some "hypothetical lawsuit" that you're talking about

its loving bullstuff, stop it already

no one is going to go to jail or pay a fine for not buying some stuff program

how about if itunes suddenly put in the terms that you have to pay 5 dollars a month to use it but made it not mandatory, do you think that would hold up in court at all? 

[Trogtor]

knowing Apple they'd probably take every person to court they possibly could lmao

[shitlord]

knowing Apple they'd probably take every person to court they possibly could lmao

and they would lose every single one

[Maxwell.]

use 7zip because winrar causes internet arguments

[Clownfish]

I use 7zip because it doesn't change my .zip icons
(I can probably change them back but still)

[SeventhSandwich]

Yeah p sure it just says you need to pay for it then you just click x and continue using it

The forget is wrong with you? WinRAR is not free software, you bastard!

[Nonnel]

law is only a concept

[BluetoothBoy]

yeah no, i loving assure you no judge and jury is going to do some "hypothetical lawsuit" that you're talking about

its loving bullstuff, stop it already

no one is going to go to jail or pay a fine for not buying some stuff program

how about if itunes suddenly put in the terms that you have to pay 5 dollars a month to use it but made it not mandatory, do you think that would hold up in court at all? 

We were really just discussing whether or not it was illegal and if it is something that could prompt such action being taken, not the likeliness of someone actually bringing the matter to court.

[Foxscotch]

yeah no, i loving assure you no judge and jury is going to do some "hypothetical lawsuit" that you're talking about

what?

no one is going to go to jail or pay a fine for not buying some stuff program

you will if they decide to sue you for it

how about if itunes suddenly put in the terms that you have to pay 5 dollars a month to use it but made it not mandatory, do you think that would hold up in court at all? 

no, but that's not comparable to this, either

[shitlord]

what?you will if they decide to sue you for itno, but that's not comparable to this, either

no

first off, if they do sue you, they will lose, also i don't know what you don't understand about the first part

the itunes scenario is just fine

[Pecon]

The itunes scenario isn't fine because the winrar terms have not suddenly changed without warning, they have warned that the software isn't free right from the start.

I still think it's highly, highly, highly unlikely that rarlabs would ever sue an individual for not paying. It would literally cost them more than they could possibly be rewarded as damages from you.