Poll

do you think north korea will follow through with its promises?

yes
4 (10%)
no
36 (90%)

Total Members Voted: 40

Author Topic: [NEWS] Kim Jong-un vows nuclear restraint; seeks normalization with USA, China  (Read 101901 times)

in sheer manpower, maybe
but their guns, artillery, planes, tanks, technology are all ~60 years old as well
they also have bad training and they're poorly fed

north korea was better off than south korea during the korean war. any war would be total devastation for them
north korea's troops are actually highly renowned for their supreme discipline

look no further than the blue house raid when they tried to assassinate the president of south korea for their special units' capabilities

I don't get why SK thought it would be a good idea to have their capitol so close to the border
seoul is the historical capital of korea. they didn't settle the city near the parallel, it's been there since the country's conception

look no further than the blue house raid when they tried to assassinate the president of south korea for their special units' capabilities
I hardly think 1968 is anywhere near comparable to today.

I hardly think 1968 is anywhere near comparable to today.
the point is people may laugh at north korea's ineptitude when it comes to many things, but its military isn't shouldn't be one of them

as far as land doctrine is concerned, north korea is one of the most potent boom-and-bust forces on the planet (meaning they couldn't hold out in an extended conflict but could inflict incredible damage for the time they would be fighting)
« Last Edit: March 04, 2016, 02:03:33 PM by Jairo »

Can we take a moment and sorta play out a scenario like this? So North Korea fires nukes at japan, they either hit/do not hit. What impact would this have on Un forces? Also we need to take into consideration that fallout will spread east if they target the southern portion or west if they target the northern portion.


What's next?

Can we take a moment and sorta play out a scenario like this? So North Korea fires nukes at japan, they either hit/do not hit. What impact would this have on Un forces? Also we need to take into consideration that fallout will spread east if they target the southern portion or west if they target the northern portion.
-snip-What's next?
They wouldn't nuke Japan first though, firing missiles at Japan is just a sham to provoke the US so that when the US takes action, they have an excuse to fire a nuke at a Piece of the US, they would probably aim for the closest piece of land that is considered US Territory and then let it escalate from there, they would not risk a nuke hitting the ocean considering their "satellite" had a misfire and landed in the ocean, so they would only use their shorter range missiles to carry a nuke, and that means hitting maybe an island that belongs to the US or something.

As for the aftermath? Well there would be tons of contaminated fish...heck maybe even dead, the beaches would be unsafe for quite a while, not much but what would really matter is what island they would fire at... that is the big variable.

fallout 5 is irl confirmed
« Last Edit: March 04, 2016, 06:25:51 PM by Lego lad »

Also I find it interesting how karma works in east asia.
Japan pillages rapes and conquers part of china, manchuria and korea, and essentially oppresses them for over 20 years.
Japan goes supa commando on the pacific and polynesian islands
Japan gets hit twice by the world's first nuclear devices
Japan gets targeted by North Korea's missiles
I'll be honest, the only thing the world will lose if japan gets attacked/destroyed is the economic benefits
do you know what european and modern american people did to native americans? african people?
and what the british, specifically, did all around the world, lasting until a couple of decades ago?

do you know what european and modern american people did to native americans? african people?
and what the british, specifically, did all around the world, lasting until a couple of decades ago?
Yes yes bring up stuff from 300 years ago

do you know what european and modern american people did to native americans? african people?
and what the british, specifically, did all around the world, lasting until a couple of decades ago?

you know none of them are alive now, right? they all died. you seem to forget that the world rotates through a population.

I'll be honest, the only thing the world will lose if japan gets attacked/destroyed is the economic benefits
this^

do you know what european and modern american people did to native americans? african people?
and what the british, specifically, did all around the world, lasting until a couple of decades ago?
The sins of the father are not passed down to the son

The sins of the father are not passed down to the son

unless you're a "progressive" in which case white people can't be tribal and are personally responsible for the murders their ancestors committed

in which case white people can't be tribal
you have this backwards friend, they think people of colour can't be tribal, and that you can't be tribal against a white person

Yes yes bring up stuff from 300 years ago
you know none of them are alive now, right? they all died. you seem to forget that the world rotates through a population.
um did u guys read the post I was responding to orrrr what
japan did that stuff in the 1590s

also british colonialism, like I said, ended just a couple of decades ago

um did u guys read the post I was responding to orrrr what
japan did that stuff in the 1590s

also british colonialism, like I said, ended just a couple of decades ago
Japan did all that in the early 1900s up until the end of WW2.

Going by their logic most people in Japan currently had nothing to do with it though so...