Author Topic: JitankIscigarette - BLM troll, autism magnet  (Read 52889 times)

if you think that black people "forced out" white people from urban areas at any point in history, you'd be completely wrong

I personally don't want to live there.

this was literally never true

what happened was home sellers wanted to find a way to sell these hip, new "suburban" homes, so they used a practice called "blockbusting," leaving whites to sell homes in fear of black or other race neighbors, leading to white people being clustered in the suburban area of urban development

if you think that black people "forced out" white people from urban areas at any point in history, you'd be completely wrong


That's completely false. The detroit race riots destroyed many businesses and drove out the whites in hordes because they no longer wanted to live in that area it was also brought on by the citys leadership which was corrupt and known for its overspending.


That's completely false. The detroit race riots destroyed many businesses and drove out the whites in hordes because they no longer wanted to live in that area it was also brought on by the citys leadership which was corrupt and known for its overspending.


I'm sorry you fail to acknowledge the historical facts but maybe you should read up on it.

this was literally never true

what happened was home sellers wanted to find a way to sell these hip, new "suburban" homes, so they used a practice called "blockbusting," leaving whites to sell homes in fear of black or other race neighbors, leading to white people being clustered in the suburban area of urban development

if you think that black people "forced out" white people from urban areas at any point in history, you'd be completely wrong


Sorry to post again but...

"Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit's black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent. It was not despair that fueled the riot. It was the riot which marked the beginning of the decline of Detroit to its current state of despair. Detroit's population today is only half of what it once was, and its most productive people have been the ones who fled.[18] [Note: In Origins of the Urban CrCIA, Thomas Sugrue states that over 20% of Detroit's adult black population in the 1950s and 1960s was out of work, along with 30% of black youth between eighteen and twenty-four] [22]

Still better looking than Jitank
Jitank is a pretty good looking guy. That's about all he has going for him though.

I'm sorry you fail to acknowledge the historical facts but maybe you should read up on it.

i'm sorry that i took a year long AP class that described these events in detail. :^)


Sorry to post again but...

"Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit's black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent. It was not despair that fueled the riot. It was the riot which marked the beginning of the decline of Detroit to its current state of despair. Detroit's population today is only half of what it once was, and its most productive people have been the ones who fled.[18] [Note: In Origins of the Urban CrCIA, Thomas Sugrue states that over 20% of Detroit's adult black population in the 1950s and 1960s was out of work, along with 30% of black youth between eighteen and twenty-four] [22]

black population came in through white flight, then events became worse as riots happened in, likely, low income and industrial areas. just because they had the highest home-ownership doesn't mean that they were rich, and low unemployment rate didn't mean that they weren't poor working conditions. sure, you could debate that the riots drove "whites" out of the city, but that was much less of a problem.

moreover, what does this source proves? it only notes that there were some riots from within detroit, nothing more. it doesn't provide a reason for why whites left detroit, which is explained in my previous quote. white flight occurred mainly in the 1950's, as well, while this article states that the first riots occurred in 1967 of all years, at the point where most white flight had began to end. i would recommend that you read more about urban development vs black people destroying urban areas (which is apparrent in your quote, but not within what i had argued).

if you have a source for the passage that i most recently quoted, i'd love to read it. but it doesn't strengthen your argument.

i'm sorry that i took a year long AP class that described these events in detail. :^)

black population came in through white flight, then events became worse as riots happened in, likely, low income and industrial areas. just because they had the highest home-ownership doesn't mean that they were rich, and low unemployment rate didn't mean that they weren't poor working conditions. sure, you could debate that the riots drove "whites" out of the city, but that was much less of a problem.

moreover, what does this source proves? it only notes that there were some riots from within detroit, nothing more. it doesn't provide a reason for why whites left detroit, which is explained in my previous quote. white flight occurred mainly in the 1950's, as well, while this article states that the first riots occurred in 1967 of all years, at the point where most white flight had began to end. i would recommend that you read more about urban development vs black people destroying urban areas (which is apparrent in your quote, but not within what i had argued).

if you have a source for the passage that i most recently quoted, i'd love to read it. but it doesn't strengthen your argument.

Wow, I took an AP course too.... on U.S history.... what's your point.


The catalyst of white flight was the Detroit race riots which caused damages to property and caused the deaths of many citizens of Detroit. This was what caused "white flight" to the suburbs and resulted in a huge reduction of city funds that are needed for to maintain basic city infrastructure. The corruption of the Democratic city government and the decline of the automobile industry also led to the decline of Detroit. White flight was a primary factor in the decline of detroit as they contributed the most to the tax system and after they left to safer places to live (because they were pushed out by the race riots and forced into suburbs) this led to the collapse of Detroit. Sure, other factors were important but white flight was definitely one of the larger issues as to why Detroit became impoverished.

This was the damage caused by the race riots
 Over the period of five days, forty-three people died, of whom 33 were black and 10 white. There were 467 injured: 182 civilians, 167 Detroit police officers, 83 Detroit firefighters, 17 National Guard troops, 16 State Police officers, and three U.S. Army soldiers. In the riots, 2,509 stores were looted or burned, 388 families were rendered homeless or displaced, and 412 buildings were burned or damaged enough to be demolished. Dollar losses from arson and looting ranged from $40 million to $80 million.[20]

Thousands of small businesses closed as a result of the race riots. If you're telling me that white flight isn't a major reason for the decline of detroit you'd be wrong.

What it really comes down to is three reasons: The decline of the automobile industry, White Flight, and the policies of the Detroit City Government.


The passage I cited earlier was written by an economist named Thomas Sowell.


i'm sorry that i took a year long AP class that described these events in detail. :^)

black population came in through white flight, then events became worse as riots happened in, likely, low income and industrial areas. just because they had the highest home-ownership doesn't mean that they were rich, and low unemployment rate didn't mean that they weren't poor working conditions. sure, you could debate that the riots drove "whites" out of the city, but that was much less of a problem.

moreover, what does this source proves? it only notes that there were some riots from within detroit, nothing more. it doesn't provide a reason for why whites left detroit, which is explained in my previous quote. white flight occurred mainly in the 1950's, as well, while this article states that the first riots occurred in 1967 of all years, at the point where most white flight had began to end. i would recommend that you read more about urban development vs black people destroying urban areas (which is apparrent in your quote, but not within what i had argued).

if you have a source for the passage that i most recently quoted, i'd love to read it. but it doesn't strengthen your argument.

Also, the ghetto riots happened afterwards but the main race riots happened in 1943 and is directly responsible for the "white flight" you speak of. So you should probably do a little more research into the subject.

Yeah, theres more to it.



You guys know that there are different dog/cat breeds right?
Some are smarter than others, different body types, different personality and so on

Same applies for humans
well the reason dogs are like this is because they have been selectively bred specifically to bring out certain desirable qualities. the same can't really be said for humans, we just have lots of genetic diversity

41 god damn pages god damn

well the reason dogs are like this is because they have been selectively bred specifically to bring out certain desirable qualities. the same can't really be said for humans, we just have lots of genetic diversity

We actually did force breed slaved back then. They picked the strongest looking slaved and forced them to have love. This is why black people always look so scary

So yes, black people were selectively bred lol

We actually did force breed slaved back then. They picked the strongest looking slaved and forced them to have love. This is why black people always look so scary
Boy im so glad i dont know you in person. You really got me all the way forgeted up. Say it to a black person irl and see what happens.

41 god damn pages god damn
its because tony bumps it every time it dies

its because tony bumps it every time it dies
it's stayed on the top of the front page since it was made