Author Topic: [NEWS] Clinton vote lead grows to 2 mil; Stein opens recount req. in WI, MI, PA  (Read 20739 times)

ranked choice voting fixes every problem

Jesus christ we got it the first ten times you told us

you clearly haven't considered it or else you, too, would be wondering why it hasn't yet been instituted



welcome to United

Christ this is possibly the most loving butt-hurt election ever like what the forget
« Last Edit: November 16, 2016, 12:45:53 AM by Decepticon »

you clearly haven't considered it or else you, too, would be wondering why it hasn't yet been instituted

I would if you could stop ramming it up our asses

I would if you could stop ramming it up our asses
look into it bruv
no downsides

on-topic now, probably never going to happen, EC is there to ensure each state has a say in an election. california is just assblasted their 55 EC votes didn't matter in this election cycle and are being a bunch of loving crybabies about it


Republicans in democrat states would actually have a point in voting if they got rid of the College

Republicans in democrat states would actually have a point in voting if they got rid of the College
they'd also have a point if states actually gave their votes proportionately instead of the winner getting all of them. all those nearly 50/50 states would've split their votes, and even if one party only got 33% that'd still be 33% of their minimum of 3 available votes, which would guarantee at least one vote that would otherwise go to someone else

There should also have a set number of Electoral voters to actual state populations.



Individual Texan votes have nearly 4x less pull in the College than Wyoming votes, for example.

Now that I think about it some more, abolishing the Electoral College would likely improve voter turnout. This is pure conjecture, but I'd be willing to bet there are a fair number of people who live in a state that almost always goes to the party they're not aligned with; then when voting season comes around, they figure their vote won't matter because their state will go in the opposite direction regardless. I can definitely imagine, say, a Annoying Orange supporter in California deciding not to vote because California nearly always goes blue. Or a Clinton supporter in Alabama who figures a single drop of blue is nothing compared to an ocean of red.

If the election was decided on pure popular vote, these people would be more inclined to vote. Probably.

can we just get some of that compulsory voting stuff that egypt has and count up those 96.91%  majority vote wins

just make it so you pay 1% less taxes/get extra 1% back when doing tax returns for voting. everyone will vote.

just make it so you pay 1% less taxes/get extra 1% back when doing tax returns for voting. everyone will vote.
if you were to pay everyone a cent for voting the US dollar would become one cent weaker

4MILLION uncounted absentee ballots in 2016 Hillary wouldn't have won the popular vote.