Poll

Do you?

Yes
135 (75.8%)
No
43 (24.2%)

Total Members Voted: 176

Author Topic: Do you think Lolicon should be considered child enthusiasm?  (Read 70592 times)

then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?
how about we just consider it some degenerate weeb art and go on about our days because nobody actually got hurt

also are we discussing the morality or legality of lolicon? the titles a bit confusing

thats the thing about loli, to people it's the next best thing and I don't think many people into loli just search up midget research, even then they would still have some sort of facial features that indicate that it's not a loving 6 year old

ok, i'm just gonna say this now, but 6 years old is like borderline toddlercon. and trust me, that's WAY loving worse

then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?

...loli? the name it was given?

Pretty sure the defining feature of a child enthusiast is an attraction to young body features, not an attraction to people below age-whatever.
i always interpreted it as being underage and having those features but it's a pretty vague and controversial definition so YMMV
*Be a pilgrim*

"that 8 year old is actually a witch, lets rape her"
also this is a terrible brown townogy because a witch would just be burned, not raped. pretty sure loving a witch would give you some sort of terrible curse and send you to hell in pilgrim beliefs
then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?
no, it should be considered explicit art because there's no actual child having love, it's victimless

i always interpreted it as being underage and having those features but it's a pretty vague and controversial definition so YMMValso this is a terrible brown townogy because a witch would just be burned, not raped. pretty sure loving a witch would give you some sort of terrible curse and send you to hell in pilgrim beliefsno, it should be considered explicit art because there's no actual child having love, it's victimless

>7th century peasant
>Child is having seizure
>"holy stuff that kid is possessed by a demon, better rape it out of her"

It's already illegal in many parts of the world, including quite a few states here in the US. It may not be counted as child enthusiasm but it's still prosecutable in plenty of countries.

>7th century peasant
>Child is having seizure
>"holy stuff that kid is possessed by a demon, better rape it out of her"
when did this happen??

if you justify being attracted to a loli that is clearly a child because the author says she's hundreds of years old, you're in a deep state of denial.

i mean yall can argue all you want about whether or not it should be considered a crime, but at the end of the day you still beat it to depictions little girls lmao, theres no gray area

alright, give me an example then Mother forgeter
Have u heard of the roman god of erotic love, cupid? He is depicted as a young boy with wings

There are quite a few deities / ancient beings depicted as children friendo.


do you guys really wanna deprive the world of loli?




it's gross imo but I don't think it should be illegal

« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 05:21:51 PM by cooolguy32 »