[NEWS] Violent UC Berkeley riots force cancellation of Milo Yiannopoulos event

Author Topic: [NEWS] Violent UC Berkeley riots force cancellation of Milo Yiannopoulos event  (Read 38243 times)

The right to assemble should only apply to people who democracy (not the left)

The right to assemble should only apply to people who democracy (not the left)
fake news

Antifa promotes and practices violence.

I always lol @ people who think that an organization that doesn't promote or order terrorist actions can be labeled a terrorist organization

With this entirely stupid and anger-driven ideology you can label the alt-right a terrorist organization because 10 of them beat up someone. loving hilarious. What's even worse is that it isn't even an organization; it's a movement. Haha
Except for Antifa it's not 10 people, it's thousands nation-wide partaking in this stuff. If it's a movement then it's a terrorist movement, because all they've done for anyone is just cause damage and destruction. If destroying buildings and smashing windows, along with beating innocent people to the point where people are drawing guns to defend themselves isn't considered terrorism then this country is forgeted.

im not gonna justify their actions, only explain them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_polarization

when a group of angry individuals gets together and they find their beliefs unchallenged among that group, they ramp up what they believe to the extreme. and because they act as a group and lose their sense of individuality, the consequences seem far away to them as an individual. this is another example of organized fury turning into a primal outlash. the problem is rooted not within violent individuals, but the discord causing this incredibly angry conglomerate to form in the first place. the only way to stop riots like these is not some stupid stuff like protest-suppression bills, but rather an easing of the tensions producing these situations. this requires people on both sides of the political spectrum to negotiate closer to the center.
But the issue here is that only one side is open to discussion, which oddly enough is the right/alt-right, because any time they try to discuss with the left they are met with shouting matches, examples such as HWNDU and BJ On The Streets, where they literally make a wall around you with people, and don't allow your opinion to be heard.

The problem isn't negotiating, the problem is that only one side is open to it, and the other doesn't want to.

Except for Antifa it's not 10 people, it's thousands nation-wide partaking in this stuff. If it's a movement then it's a terrorist movement, because all they've done for anyone is just cause damage and destruction. If destroying buildings and smashing windows, along with beating innocent people to the point where people are drawing guns to defend themselves isn't considered terrorism then this country is forgeted.
neo national socialistsm isn't a terrorist organizations, yet several people who follow the movement have engaged in terrorist-like activities. Most notable would be Dylan Roof as a recent example.

Terrorist movements don't exist. You cannot try and arrest someone as a 'terrorist' because they believe in something. You can, however, try and arrest someone for engaging in terrorist activities, violent protesting not one of these. If someone who claims to be anti-fascist decides to barge into a Milo meeting and shoot it up, that person is considered a terrorist. If the antifa website says "show up to this meeting and shoot people" they can officially be considered a terrorist organization, loosely. So far none of these things have happened, although a couple members did almost attempt to stinkbomb a rally or something. That's as close to terrorism as they've ever gotten
« Last Edit: February 02, 2017, 04:02:49 PM by PhantOS »

You can, however, try and arrest someone for engaging in terrorist activities, violent protesting not one of these.
what is that sentence

what is that sentence
I meant that violent protest is not a form of terrorist activity, it's a crime.

Violent protesting AKA rioting is a felony circa Obama admin.

If it was conceivably possible for an ideology to be considered a terrorist organization, anyone following or believing in that ideology would be arrested. If you don't understand what that means, it translates to "you can get arrested for expressing an opinion"

If you really believe in freedom of speech, now is your moment to shine.

Antifa is about as much for free speech as PETA is against animal cruelty.

Violently protesting can get you arrested. There is no right that allows you to beat people, vandalise public property, or anything of the sort. Sorry, but that is how the world works

Violently protesting can get you arrested. There is no right that allows you to beat people, vandalise public property, or anything of the sort. Sorry, but that is how the world works
it's like we're on loving repeat here

violent/destructive protesting is rioting which comes with any proportional punishment

but you can protest all you want outside whoever's event whether your protesting helps anything at all or not

it's like we're on loving repeat here

violent/destructive protesting is rioting which comes with any proportional punishment

but you can protest all you want outside whoever's event whether your protesting helps anything at all or not
Yeah I know this. My post was directed towards Path who said voilent protesting cannot get you arrested

it's like we're on loving repeat here

violent/destructive protesting is rioting which comes with any proportional punishment

but you can protest all you want outside whoever's event whether your protesting helps anything at all or not

Lordy no one is saying protesting peacefully is bad. We're saying using violence and destruction of property to block someone from speaking is bad.

E: Even and ESPECIALLY if you don't agree with said speaker.

Yeah I know this. My post was directed towards Path who said voilent protesting cannot get you arrested


you need a pair of these INH. read my posts again. find one place where I said violent protesting was or should be legal