Author Topic: Call of Duty WW2 (Read 8436 times)

TheScout · April 22, 2017, 01:14:55 AM

seriously, why on earth is anybody at all excited about another WWII game. there can be no innovation. there are no original ideas, there is nothing that hasn't already been covered. pretty much every front of the entire war has been covered multiple times. weapon customization will be at a minimum because there weren't loving tactical rails back then. player customization probably won't exist, because of how many countries we could be playing as. the campaign would have to be complete fiction to be anything even remotely novel at this point. all the environments will be dull, brown and grey warzones or deserts because it takes place in loving world war 2. and to top it all off, Treyarch isn't making it.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

IkeTheGeneric · April 22, 2017, 01:18:45 AM

Quote from: TheScout on April 22, 2017, 01:14:55 AM

there can be no innovation.

I agree, we should start another war for new material.

Conan · April 22, 2017, 01:27:42 AM

i wouldnt mind another ww2 game: remastering old ww2 games doesnt really seem worth it and theres still potential for interesting squad based or realistic combat like seen in brothers in arms: hells highway

DestroyerOfBlocks · April 22, 2017, 01:46:23 AM

Quote from: TheScout on April 22, 2017, 01:14:55 AM

there can be no innovation.

its call of duty dude what innovation

espio100 · April 22, 2017, 08:53:47 AM

Quote from: Kidalex90 on April 21, 2017, 09:50:23 PM

this is bull stuff we need a cod in the civil war

>run at a pace of 5mph
>find enemy after 2 hours of running
>we both shoot and miss
>walk arround in circles reloading for 5 minutes
>fire again
>I shot him
>he dies
>suddenly get shredded by a howitzer
>respawn 50 miles from the battle
>try to hop in horse
>CoD doesnt have vehicles, its just a prop
>run there for another 30 minutes
>finally arrive at the battle
>your team lost
>what.jpg
>some forgetface stole the flag because nobody is actually at their base
>that dude spend 60 minutes walking from their base and back
haha unfunny greentext

Mr. Bones · April 22, 2017, 08:55:00 AM

Quote from: Superbro11 on April 21, 2017, 03:06:48 PM

Of loving course they are gonna copy Battlefields 1 success by putting it in a similar timeline.
Glad they actually cut the dam future crap, it was getting annoying.

You realize COD was doing games in this timeline back in like 2003 right? Stop saying games are copying others just because they're a hint similar.

HellHound · April 22, 2017, 11:08:51 AM

If there's going to be another World War 2 game, I want to play as the Germans or Japanese.

MoltenKitten · April 22, 2017, 11:57:28 AM

Quote from: espio100 on April 22, 2017, 08:53:47 AM

>run at a pace of 5mph
>find enemy after 2 hours of running
>we both shoot and miss
>walk arround in circles reloading for 5 minutes
>fire again
>I shot him
>he dies
>suddenly get shredded by a howitzer
>respawn 50 miles from the battle
>try to hop in horse
>CoD doesnt have vehicles, its just a prop
>run there for another 30 minutes
>finally arrive at the battle
>your team lost
>what.jpg
>some forgetface stole the flag because nobody is actually at their base
>that dude spend 60 minutes walking from their base and back
haha unfunny greentext

you forgot the part where you get grazed by a bullet and die 3 hours later to disease

Poliwhirl · April 22, 2017, 01:27:50 PM

cooler idea for a ww2 game: war in africa

RedGajin · April 22, 2017, 08:59:24 PM

Quote from: TheScout on April 22, 2017, 01:14:55 AM

seriously, why on earth is anybody at all excited about another WWII game. there can be no innovation. there are no original ideas, there is nothing that hasn't already been covered. pretty much every front of the entire war has been covered multiple times. weapon customization will be at a minimum because there weren't loving tactical rails back then. player customization probably won't exist, because of how many countries we could be playing as. the campaign would have to be complete fiction to be anything even remotely novel at this point. all the environments will be dull, brown and grey warzones or deserts because it takes place in loving world war 2. and to top it all off, Treyarch isn't making it.

name a popular fps thats come out recently that takes place in WWII

Insert Name Here� · April 22, 2017, 09:04:17 PM

i swear to forget if they forget to add in the d-day battle

SimpleFish · April 22, 2017, 09:41:51 PM

Quote from: Insert Name Here� on April 22, 2017, 09:04:17 PM

i swear to forget if they forget to add in the d-day battle

thats the last thing they should put in the game considering how its been done to death in every ww2 fps.

MoltenKitten · April 22, 2017, 09:44:25 PM

Quote from: SimpleFish on April 22, 2017, 09:41:51 PM

thats the last thing they should put in the game considering how its been done to death in every ww2 fps.

because it's arguably the most important battle of the war

Insert Name Here� · April 22, 2017, 09:59:52 PM

Quote from: SimpleFish on April 22, 2017, 09:41:51 PM

thats the last thing they should put in the game considering how its been done to death in every ww2 fps.

its a major historical part of ww2 though?

hey national socialists are overdone to death in every ww2 fps that means theyre bad

Conan · April 22, 2017, 10:11:09 PM

its also one of the most "awesome epic" battles since it literally involved sending waves of people through a beach with minimal cover aka every "i want to be a leet noscope murdering machine"s dream location to show their ability to singlehandedly murder an entire national socialist division