Poll

BILL NYE WAS THE CHOSEN ONE

HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DESTROY TO THE SJWS
18 (27.7%)
NOT JOIN THEM
6 (9.2%)
BRING BALANCE TO REALITY
6 (9.2%)
NOT LEAVE IT IN DARKNESS
3 (4.6%)
YOU WERE MY BROTHER BILL NYE, I LOVED YOU!
32 (49.2%)

Total Members Voted: 65

Author Topic: Billnye has turned to the darkside  (Read 22826 times)

Reread master matthew's post.
I read masters posts- they're as tinfoil hatting as I think and he's being an idiot as usual.

Well asserting there is more than 2 genders for humans is an unscientific position to hold.
but it isn't when gender is defined as being different from love

So is that the reason Brian died that one time on family guy? Justice for owning a prius?
Nah, that was a little thing called...
MARKETING

I read masters posts- they're as tinfoil hatting as I think and he's being an idiot as usual.
I dont see how its tinfoil hat to see the flaws in affirmative action:
Such as, only chhosing someone for a highere education because of their ethnicity and not their merit.

Aka, people are shoved into jobs theyre not prepared for.

Nah, that was a little thing called...
MARKETING

I dont see how its tinfoil hat to see the flaws in affirmative action:
Such as, only chhosing someone for a highere education because of their ethnicity and not their merit.

Aka, people are shoved into jobs theyre not prepared for.


Aka, people are shoved into jobs theyre not prepared for.
I would say it's moreso people getting a free pass into jobs or colleges they're not qualified for, all because of their skin color or gender. SJWs talk about "white privilege" all the time but there's far more "minority privilege" to be found when it comes to college scholarships. It's discrimination at it's finest.

I would say it's moreso people getting a free pass into jobs or colleges they're not qualified for, all because of their skin color or gender. SJWs talk about "white privilege" all the time but there's far more "minority privilege" to be found when it comes to college scholarships. It's discrimination at it's finest.
This makes red's post all the more perplexing, unless hes talking about my first post, in which case, i think i mayhave misread the whole prius thing

This makes red's post all the more perplexing, unless hes talking about my first post, in which case, i think i mayhave misread the whole prius thing
Maybe he means that the existence of affirmative action can be used as a form of marketing college to minorities.

I too believe there are only 2 genders, but honestly I fail to see any problem with any form of gender identification.

If someone identifies as x gender and they aren't harming anyone then it shouldn't be a problem for anyone.

Thr popular belief isnt the correct one
The unpopular belief is the incorrect one about 80% of the time. This is why we don't have skinheads running our country

The one proven by evidence and facts is the correct one.
WHO has conducted medical studies for over 10 years on gender identity and its affects on society. They're 1 million times more qualified than you are.

And ive yet too see some "third gender" genitalia.
That's because there's only two lovees you dipstuff. When was there ever a third love in the world?

Why? Because there are two, count em, two, genders.
There's two lovees and over 60+ genders. Stop acting handicapped

Quote
Patients and public
Ethical, legal and social implications
Research
Craniofacial anomalies
Gender and Genetics

Genetic Components of love and Gender

Humans are born with 46 chromosomes in 23 pairs. The X and Y chromosomes determine a person’s love. Most women are 46XX and most men are 46XY. Research suggests, however, that in a few births per thousand some individuals will be born with a single love chromosome (45X or 45Y) (love monosomies) and some with three or more love chromosomes (47XXX, 47XYY or 47XXY, etc.) (love polysomies). In addition, some males are born 46XX due to the translocation of a tiny section of the love determining region of the Y chromosome. Similarly some females are also born 46XY due to mutations in the Y chromosome. Clearly, there are not only females who are XX and males who are XY, but rather, there is a range of chromosome complements, hormone balances, and phenotypic variations that determine love.

The biological differences between men and women result from two processes: love determination and differentiation.(3) The biological process of love determination controls whether the male or female loveual differentiation pathway will be followed. The process of biological love differentiation (development of a given love) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps. More than 95% of the Y chromosome is male-specific (4) and a single copy of the Y chromosome is able to induce testicular differentiation of the embryonic gonad. The Y chromosome acts as a dominant inducer of male phenotype and individuals having four X chromosomes and one Y chromosome (49XXXXY) are phenotypically male. (5) When a Y chromosome is present, early embryonic testes develop around the 10th week of pregnancy. In the absence of both a Y chromosome and the influence of a testis-determining factor (TDF), ovaries develop.

Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and love and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines such as male and female or homoloveual and heteroloveual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.

These are top scientists who went to medical school for many years and get payed thousands of dollars to conduct this type of research. Compared to you or your 4chan buddies, they are the qualified ones. Stop trying to act like your opinion is fact and everyone should follow it.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2017, 10:07:51 PM by PhantOS »

The unpopular belief is the incorrect one about 80% of the time. This is why we don't have skinheads running our country
WHO has conducted medical studies for over 10 years on gender identity and its affects on society. They're 1 million times more qualified than you are.
That's because there's only two lovees you dipstuff. When was there ever a third love in the world?
There's two lovees and over 60+ genders. Stop acting handicapped

These are top scientists who went to medical school for many years and get payed thousands of dollars to conduct this type of research. Compared to you or your 4chan buddies, they are the qualified ones. Stop trying to act like your opinion is fact and everyone should follow it.

lovees are loving genders.

Your gender is either XX or XY

lovees are loving genders.

Your gender is either XX or XY
quite literally wrong

There's two lovees and over 60+ genders. Stop acting handicapped
I see the male and female genders as a spectrum with everything in between being either more masculine or more feminine; and that everything in between being the so called "60+ genders". But I still see it as only male and female being the 2 genders.

Are there any articles or anything you can provide that could possibly help me understand the dynamics of 60+ genders?

I see the male and female genders as a spectrum with everything in between being either more masculine or more feminine; everything in between being the so called "60+ genders." But I still see it as only male and female being the 2 genders.

Are there any articles or anything you can provide that could possibly help me understand the dynamics of 60+ genders?
Im starting to see some other things on the spectrum today...

You can't scientifically prove the number of genders because it's a social construct, it'd be like saying you scientifically proved the word "too" doesn't exist. The number of genders falls onto opinion.