Homegrown terrorism isn't as much of a problem for us as you think it is and there is almost no way to prevent it in our current state of address. Any of your proposed ideas would actually amplify the prevalence of domestic extremism. Our best hope is to continue ignoring it until it becomes something worth tackling, because otherwise we're just going to waste more money and risk more manpower over an imaginary war on terrorism.
We know where the problem is now and we're fully equipped to at least try to handle it. Let's stop pretending it's a domestic issue.
Fair enough
literally no muslim I have ever met has blown me up
Holy stuff that must mean NO MUSLIMS at ALL will EVER try to blow you up! Well, forget me, I've been proven wrong. Sorry guys!
Unless you're going to specify specific policies you're going to make people think you're going on another tribal tangent
1). Immigration is a difficult issue but I think it should start by importing people that would actually benefit us instead of sitting on welfare for a while
2.) This is getting into iffy territory because that could mean anything from forcing people to report radical stuff to full on monitoring of mosques
You can't even get into immigration talks without being called a tribal. It's ridiculous.
I don't think I said anything overtly tribal besides using the term goatforgeter to describe a literal forgeter of goats, unless Islam is a race, then my bad ):
And I know, it is iffy territory, but if we don't have the discussion, how are we supposed to make it less national socialistesque and more reasonable? Believe me, I know it's loving insane to ask that we start removing mosques that radicalize people from the board, but we have to do something? We can't just sit on our hands because if we act we'll be called tribal for it by a bunch of apologist babies. We have two options, harsh domestic policy, or doing whatever is necessary overseas to end CIA and any other Islamic extremist groups that crop up in the middle east and embolden these homegrown terrorists to act.
The whole basis of your argument resides around these points
- people believe in something different
- The perpetrators of attacks (that happen usually twice every year and kill around 20 people) are these people
- Punishing a billion people for the actions of around 5,000 worldwide is fine
i could take this autistic list and apply it to any race in the world and justify anything against them which is why its hypocritical and handicapped. If you really wanted to do something about these actions happening you'd be also condemning white people, black people, hispanics, asians, literally every human population in the world.
the only reason why you choose muslims is because of two things: they aren't you, and they're the easiest target. you're literally pulling a Riddler/enver pasha right now and you seem perfectly fine about it
Why're you suck a loving mental midget? Burn that strawman if you want, that's not my argument at all, so forget you.
1. I don't dislike Muslims because they believe "something different". I dislike their ideology and religion, and the supremacist, homophobic and blatantly misogynist culture surrounding it. I must dislike Buddhists too since they believe in something I don't. loving idiot. Shut up.
2. Twice every year, 20 people? Paris, Sweden, London, Germany, let's not even talk about the rapes, the murders, the loveual assaults, those don't matter, those people aren't dead, just emotionally scarred, right?
3. 5,000? Again, go forget yourself. If CIA only had 5,000 soldiers working with them we'd be sweeping Islamist ashes off the dunes by now.
You're loving autistic if you think you can apply your strawman list to other religions (Muslims are not a race, forget off)
Poll