Author Topic: [noose] transgenders not allowed in military  (Read 18799 times)

I mean he's right your argument was garbage
Speak for yourself, considering you've been loving permanently banned for how garbage your political agenda is

< muh cosmetic surgery
Yeah if only you could actually compare completely destroying natural processes of the body to straightening a nose by a couple degrees, your argument would be so easy to make. Cool 6 gorrilion years of Certified Liberal research bro
In what way are you disabled if you're trans? If you're infertile and you told no one, no one would know - not only that but you can have your sperm or eggs stored so that you can still have biological kids later.

what argument is there? you're absolutely correct that the military should be focused on fighting and not administering hormone treatment

lucky for you, that's how our military has operated for the last 6 years. if you don't know what that means, it means that 4% of the military that is transgender has successfully been transgender while focusing on, you know, serving in the military. so you're intended point that transgender people are a burden to the military is objectively false, and in the cases where it is objectively true, ie, people currently on hormone treatment, they wouldn't be allowed into the military.
Oh lmao glad you actually agree then, the way you kept doing the "tfw" garbage made it seem like you were disagreeing and purposefully trying to be annoying about it

Yeah if they've already transitioned and are actually stable both mentally and physically, they should be allowed in. If they aren't stable with their emotions and or are still transitioning and getting surgery / recovering from it, they shouldn't be allowed in until verified by a doctor or medical professional

In what way are you disabled if you're trans? If you're infertile and you told no one, no one would know - not only that but you can have your sperm or eggs stored so that you can still have biological kids later.

In what way are you disabled if you're an amputee? If you're wearing long pants and you didn't show anybody, no one would know - not only that but you can get a prosthetic leg so you can still walk.

Is this what the conditioning seriously gets people to say? forget me. We're really not far off from normalizing BIID aren't we

Yeah if they've already transitioned and are actually stable both mentally and physically, they should be allowed in. If they aren't stable with their emotions and or are still transitioning and getting surgery / recovering from it, they shouldn't be allowed in until verified by a doctor or medical professional
The way they have operated for the past 6 years does exactly this. Now fully qualified people are going to be denied because they're trans and for no other reason than that.


In what way are you disabled if you're an amputee? If you're wearing long pants and you didn't show anybody, no one would know - not only that but you can get a prosthetic leg so you can still walk.

Is this what the conditioning seriously gets people to say? forget me. We're really not far off from normalizing BIID aren't we
Last I checked being sterile doesn't have any affect on your physical or mental performance. Amputees are not even remotely relevant here.

In what way are you disabled if you're an amputee? If you're wearing long pants and you didn't show anybody, no one would know - not only that but you can get a prosthetic leg so you can still walk.

Is this what the conditioning seriously gets people to say? forget me. We're really not far off from normalizing BIID aren't we
Well the obvious effect is that you'd be wheelchair-bound or forced to use a prosthetic leg. Prosthetic legs are not 1:1 perfect solutions for having a missing limb. They offer limited mobility and they don't have nerve endings.

Having kids is something you may or may not do in your entire lifetime, and if you do you're not likely to have more than three. Undergoing a love change doesn't make it impossible for you to still have kids, it just makes it a bit more logistically involved. Having limited mobility is something that effects how you move for the rest of your life.

I don't know what you mean by "conditioning". Is it the fluoride in the water or something? Chemtrails? Do pray tell.


Last I checked being sterile doesn't have any affect on your physical or mental performance. Amputees are not even remotely relevant here.

Hey man (sorry if I just mis-gendered you), wherever you gotta move them goal posts to include permanently obliterating certain natural processes of the body and not your liberal-protected ones. The GMOs must've really done a number on y'all.

EDIT:
2015's military budget as compared to every other facet of government spending as well as the specific amount of spending dedicated to the military is displayed in the picture below.

As compared to the military budget in 2015 (It's doubtful that military budget has decreased or even increased by that much), $8.4 million is .001% approximately of $598.5 billion. It would be extremely insignificant to even pay ten times that (the amount paid for ED pills as indicated), which itself would translate into .01% percent of 2015's military budget.

nope
here's a more accurate graph

"we spend too much on the military"



oops

Hey man (sorry if I just mis-gendered you), wherever you gotta move them goal posts to include permanently obliterating certain natural processes of the body and not your liberal-protected ones. The GMOs must've really done a number on y'all.
"Did you get your wisdom teeth removed? Why would you obstruct that totally natural process? It's absolutely barbaric!"

nope
here's a more accurate graph


Discretionary spending on the military in 2015 is still over $500 billion and amounts overall to $1.1 trillion. This presumably accounts for spending when mandatory spending is added on. Give me a source and I'll review your argument further.

edit:
Also I see no numbers or any kind of reference point alluded to in that graph. Pure percentages don't really mean much.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2017, 05:59:34 PM by Johnimiester »

"Did you get your wisdom teeth removed? Why would you obstruct that totally natural process? It's absolutely barbaric!"

You realize that losing teeth is a natural loving process right? Do you still have all your baby teeth? Do your rooster and balls automatically fall off when you realize you're transgender? People getting their wisdom teeth pulled out is a cosmetic concern because it's a social expectation to have "organized" teeth, as compared to thousands of years ago when there wasn't any profit to be made in the dental industry.

BTW I love rp'd your sister on Blockland like a decade ago, just remembered that

I don't know what you mean by "conditioning". Is it the fluoride in the water or something? Chemtrails? Do pray tell.

It's called LSD micro-dosing. Look it up if you feel like learning anything except what your left-wing college feeds you. If you get too far down the rabbit hole and a guy comes to your door at 2AM asking about a lost dog, just tell him you supported Hillary and you'll be considered too dumb to be a threat.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2017, 05:58:45 PM by Rally »

Discretionary spending in 2015 is still over $500 billion and amounts to $1.1 trillion. This presumably accounts for spending when mandatory spending is added on. Give me a source and I'll review your argument further.

edit:
Also I see no numbers or any kind of reference point alluded to in that graph. Pure percentages don't really mean much.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/aug/17/facebook-posts/pie-chart-federal-spending-circulating-internet-mi/

BTW I love rp'd your sister on Blockland like a decade ago, just remembered that


BTW I love rp'd your sister on Blockland like a decade ago, just remembered that
ew???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

BTW I love rp'd your sister on Blockland like a decade ago, just remembered that