You're right, no matter how much logic is used here you're still going to double down in your dumb rhetoric. Thank god you don't have any legislative authority over this issue.
I mean, one of you just said BLM isn't an organization simply because they don't have a centralized leadership.
That's dumb as stuff. I already stated that if you want to say the entirety of Antifa isn't a organization, sure. But, like I said, there are local chapters that can definitely be counted as organizations. You guys act like people who simply use the hashtag would be counted as terrorists. That'd be handicapped. It would be the people on the ground, hiding their faces and beating the living stuff out of people. I know there's people in Antifa that aren't of the #BashtheFash variety, but that doesn't change the facts. What does Antifa have to do to be an organization, take over a state? Have a defacto leader? Would CIA not be an organization if they didn't have a leader? Is the kool kids klub no longer considered an organization if there's no grand wizard?
Would love to have it explained to me how you can declare something that isn't an organization to be an organization
The only thing any of you have to say in this matter is "It is not an organization", which isn't an argument, just a falsehood.
"An organization or organisation is an entity comprising multiple people, such as an institution or an association, that has a collective goal and is linked to an external environment. "
Like I said, you guys are just trying to split hairs. You can say it's an organization while disagreeing with it being classified as a terrorist one, you know?