bill cosby found guilty on all counts

[King Tøny]

At least 1 person in the world has a birthday today.

I don't need to prove it because it's statistically impossible for there to not be a single loving person born on this day.

but its physically possible for it to not happen. even if theres a 0.001% chance its still possible. Just like something that is statistically irrelevant can still exist.

What the forget are you talking about?

It is not possible at all to magically levitate.

Someone getting made fun of over a hashtag is incredibly loving possible, it's so possible I don't need to prove it because it happens every day.

[Ad Bot]

[IkeTheGeneric]

Big text, brain hurty.

don't flatter yourself

[Darryl McKoy]

Big text, brain hurty.

Are we meant to take your posts seriously now or is this still part of that act you were pulling?

[thegoodperry]

Seriously though.
62 accusers...
62.
Holy stuff.
That seems a little excessive of a number for not one of them to have forward in over a decade.

It smells like a bullstuff activist/get rich quick scheme system being implemented. This appears to be an
extension of the "listen and believe wamen" sect of people.
"What the #MeToo movement is saying is that women are worthy of being believed" - source
This is an attempt at setting a precedent that if a woman cries rape, no matter the circumstance, no matter how absurd it seems, they must be considered
"worthy of being believed". In the Women Ruled world this stuff can go unquestioned because if you do question it you're likely to be attacked, accused or otherwise
ruined for life.

Rape is not a matter to use to your own ends, and I have no doubt that out of the 62 of these women there are those jumping on a get rich quick bandwagon, from the quote in that video alone, this is becoming a case of the Emporer's new clothes.

If a woman claims to be raped, you must accept that it is true, or you are a bigot. If the jury finds the person innocent, than it's justification that you're in rape-culture.

If a king claims that he is wearing clothes, you must accept that is true, or you are unworthy of their current position. If the town cannot see the king's clothes, it's justification that the town is full of unworthy citizens.


This is a system to abuse people's feelings in order to take advantage of unfortunate situations.
Even in situations where a person is truly guilty of rape, if others latch on who are not actually the victim, in the long run when this comes to light
there will be a reverse situation where no one believes anyone who claims to be a rape victim, to the point that they will lose cases they should have won.

I don't think Bill Cosby is innocent, but there is no way that all 62 of those people are actual victims.

Legally bill cosby is guilty of rape, therefore that's final. It doesn't matter if there's like 61 people who lied and 1 person who told the truth. if all 62 people lied then cosby would be found innocent.

Disputing a rape case doesn't make you pro-rape or anti women. There are almost no cases of this happening. Nobody will get angry at you if you believe that there is some amount of foul play involved.

[Drydess]

Seriously though.
62 accusers...
62.
Holy stuff.
That seems a little excessive of a number for not one of them to have forward in over a decade.

It smells like a bullstuff activist/get rich quick scheme system being implemented. This appears to be an
extension of the "listen and believe wamen" sect of people.
"What the #MeToo movement is saying is that women are worthy of being believed" - source
This is an attempt at setting a precedent that if a woman cries rape, no matter the circumstance, no matter how absurd it seems, they must be considered
"worthy of being believed". In the Women Ruled world this stuff can go unquestioned because if you do question it you're likely to be attacked, accused or otherwise
ruined for life.

Rape is not a matter to use to your own ends, and I have no doubt that out of the 62 of these women there are those jumping on a get rich quick bandwagon, from the quote in that video alone, this is becoming a case of the Emporer's new clothes.

If a woman claims to be raped, you must accept that it is true, or you are a bigot. If the jury finds the person innocent, than it's justification that you're in rape-culture.

If a king claims that he is wearing clothes, you must accept that is true, or you are unworthy of their current position. If the town cannot see the king's clothes, it's justification that the town is full of unworthy citizens.


This is a system to abuse people's feelings in order to take advantage of unfortunate situations.
Even in situations where a person is truly guilty of rape, if others latch on who are not actually the victim, in the long run when this comes to light
there will be a reverse situation where no one believes anyone who claims to be a rape victim, to the point that they will lose cases they should have won.

I don't think Bill Cosby is innocent, but there is no way that all 62 of those people are actual victims.

how tf is it a bad thing for women to be considered worthy of being believed...? all that's saying is literally just that you shouldn't shut down a case just because a woman said it
circlejerk your tinfoil hat somewhere else

[King Tøny]

Its statistically insignificant if 1 of those 9 billion people ends up cutting a guy for using the #metoo hashtag. even if it did happen (it probably never did) its too insignificant to be worth mentioning

But you said it doesn't loving exist.

Your choice of words is contradicting what you're saying now.

Statistically insignificant is still existing.

[thegoodperry]

Someone getting made fun of over a hashtag is incredibly loving possible, it's so possible I don't need to prove it because it happens every day.

possible =/= true.

But you said it doesn't loving exist.

Your choice of words is contradicting what you're saying now.

Statistically insignificant is still existing.

It doesn't exist until you prove it. You haven't produced any proof of at least 1 woman getting angry at a man for using a #metoo hashtag therefore your entire argument is based on an assumption you cannot prove is true

[King Tøny]

possible =/= true.

When it is statistically impossible for it to not happen at least once a day then yes.

Possibility = truth.

I don't need to prove someone ate a hotdog today because it's statistically impossible to suggest not a single person ate a hotdog today.

[thegoodperry]

When it is statistically impossible for it to not happen at least once a day then yes.

Possibility = truth.

I don't need to prove someone ate a hotdog today because it's statistically impossible to suggest not a single person ate a hotdog today.

It is statistically possible that nobody ate a hotdog today. Until you prove someone ate a hotdog today it has no relevance to the discussion and cannot be used to back your argument

[King Tøny]

It is statistically possible that nobody ate a hotdog today.

So you're saying not a single person out of almost 8 billion on this loving planet have not ate at least 1 hotdog today?

Are you trolling?

It is not statistically possible unless every single human on the planet but 1 was wiped off the loving earth.

[thegoodperry]

So you're saying not a single person out of almost 8 billion on this loving planet have not ate at least 1 hotdog today?

Are you trolling?

They probably did but it has no relevance until you prove it has some amount of relevance and is true. If your argument is 'someone ate a hotdog today' you must prove it. just because something is statistically possible doesn't mean it absolutely happened.

[Master Matthew²]

Legally bill cosby is guilty of rape, therefore that's final. It doesn't matter if there's like 61 people who lied and 1 person who told the truth. if all 62 people lied then cosby would be found innocent.

It does matter because it could devalue actual future rape cases.

Disputing a rape case doesn't make you pro-rape or anti women. There are almost no cases of this happening. Nobody will get angry at you if you believe that there is some amount of foul play involved.

and yet... here we are.

how tf is it a bad thing for women to be considered worthy of being believed...?

Because our system works on skepticism not blind belief.
"Innocent until Proven Guilty."
Not "Believed, go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect 200 Dollars."

all that's saying is literally just that you shouldn't shut down a case just because a woman said it
circlejerk your tinfoil hat somewhere else

That is not what that says what that says is "women are worthy of being believed"
Being believed, not put under scrutiny like the rest of the cases in the United States.
As if they deserve a pass on any trial in the court of law because they're "woman worthy of being trusted."

[King Tøny]

They probably did but it has no relevance until you prove it has some amount of relevance and is true.

I don't need to loving prove someone ate a damn hotdog today because we know for a fact it has happened at least once with one person out of 8 billion.

You're sitting here telling me it's possible that out of 8 billion people not a single one of them will eat a hotdog.

And that it can't  be proven unless I prove it.

[Darryl McKoy]

Tony can't prove his argument so he's diverted into hotdogs

nice

[thegoodperry]

and yet... here we are.

yea. a rapist was found guilty for loveual assault. what about it?