How is it a strawman when I'm using actual evidence, to validate my reasoning?
You aren't using evidence, you're incorrectly paraphrasing evidence to make your reasoning easier, which is the literal definition of a strawman
MeToo's movement purpose is to raise awareness on loveual harassment. how is that incompatible with the US Justice system? If anything it's perfectly in tune with the justice system, in which loveual harassment is a crime.
The movement is literally calling forth witnesses, something that the Court does multiple times during each trial. How is that incompatible with the justice system again?