maybe if you paid attention in school you would've been able to understand his point
Then allow me to readdress his point.
you wouldnt have a problem though if all your teachers believed in the same stuff you did, would you? and its implied liberal; none of us are so dumb that we dont know you have it out for "libtards and sjws"
I actually have it out for unfair starfishs. It just so happens that "Liberalism" is very common in school districts, so many of their starfish tactics are "liberally" biased. But that doesn't mean I have anything against "liberals" because if it were the other way around, it would be no different. I'm willing to bet the problems would be the same, but the reasoning behind them would be entirely different.
its like a bully saying "technically i didnt start the fight, he punched me first." nobody is dumb enough to believe that you aren't actually responsible/dont actually believe these things
This statement implies that you believe words are violent. The only thing that can start a fight is an act of violence, and since most reasonable people don't consider words to be violent, then whoever threw the first punch must be the aggressor, but if words were to be considered violent, then the bully would have been the aggressor.
However, none of this matters, since most school districts don't go by a "who punched first" perspective, they just punish them both using completely unfair and stupid logic, similar to the previously stated "just tell the bully to pause the fight" logic.
