as much as i agree that homoloveuality shouldn't be discriminated against, naturalism is such a loving stupid fallacy
some animals rape others quite regularly, does this mean it's appropriate human behavior? no. appeals to nature are loving stupid.
the argument is that homoloveuality is unnatural. the natural counter argument is 100% valid because homoloveuality is found commonly in nature, therefore it factually cannot be deemed unnatural.
rape is bad, yes. however it is
objectively bad especially when it presents itself in a human society. homoloveuality is subjectively bad because people
think it's unnatural when in reality they are just ignorant. and this isn't really a rhetorical question directed at you, but just a general idea: other animals can freely explore their loveuality but humans can't explore their own via consensual and safe means because of this ancient-founded notion that it's unnatural?