I have posted a possibility for the election outcome in 6 variations. Choose your preferred below.

A. https://i.imgur.com/F6TVPLY.png
8 (34.8%)
B. https://i.imgur.com/uuRmNcE.png
3 (13%)
C. https://i.imgur.com/JK2OSsA.png
1 (4.3%)
D. https://i.imgur.com/sl6MVas.png
2 (8.7%)
E. https://i.imgur.com/K1GHlD3.png
2 (8.7%)
F. https://i.imgur.com/br3Sp06.png
7 (30.4%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Author Topic: U.S.A. Politics Thread | World War 3  (Read 106797 times)

im sensible only to matthew

i think there's a second officer too that recently died, they lowered the flag at the WH

matthew and tony when they see a vaguely asian man walking down the street (chinese government spy)

the second officer killed himself
Here is the explanation in reference to his tweets post-riot.

yeah I think that's pretty ridiculous lol. I think @realdonaldAnnoying Orange should've been suspended looong ago (or given some authority so that he must tweet with the same gumption as in the white house) but twitter lost any ethos or grace they might've had in doing it for that benign stuff
« Last Edit: January 10, 2021, 05:07:00 PM by Drydess »

we're just gonna have to agree to disagree then

new opp pack in the air this gas or what

At this point there are only two sides, absolute Free Speech, or objectively incorrect people. There's no middle ground lmao. There's no need to argue about it either. You're either for absolute Free Speech or you're wrong and there is no need for further communication. You either understand the problem with Big Tech censorship proper, or you're objectively wrong and in support of oligarchic control over what you get to say in the modern public forum. Don't bother arguing with me about it either, we're well past that and I'm done jebaiting retards on the subject.

There's no need for any further discussion on whether or not it's okay for a handful of people to control the main internet sphere. There's no need to talk about if it's okay for them to shut down competitor sites under the guide of moral action. There's no need to argue over the rights of a "private company" and whether or not it's okay for them to do it. You either agree that they shouldn't be able to and discuss how to fix it, or you think they should, and you're too stupid to be spoken to. You are actively standing in the way of a civil society by denying Free Speech as it is the foundation of redressing grievances. By silencing people you are effectively telling them the only way to get their point across is through violence. You are actively encouraging violent action by encouraging the tech oligarchy to censor you and the people you don't like because it delivers catharsis. Because you are too retarded to be bothered with.

I've been annoyed wondering why people are so stupid as to cheer on censorship but I've come to realize it doesn't matter and there's no point dwelling upon it. Free Speech or you're a retard. No middle ground, no need to talk about it. That's all.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 04:34:38 AM by Deus Ex »

you irl

this is why no one takes you seriously. you're intent on trolling but all you're doing is showing how actually retarded most conservatives are. good luck in the real world pal.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 04:44:01 AM by Ceist »

The big media corporations make choices to maximize profit, violating their ToS is not protected by the 1st amendment, neither is their inconsistent application of the ToS. Argument can be had about the liberties the big corporations can have about controlling the speech on their platforms, but none of this is violating the 1st amendment.

As for the absolute free speech. You think Annoying Orange should be allowed to say that Nancy Pelosi should be immediately executed for opposing his presidency? Or perhaps some big media figure lying about a smaller figure to get them ruined in the eyes of the public? Or maybe lying in a court testimony to get someone innocent prosecuted?
Free speech absolutism is objectively wrong.