Author Topic: GH:WT or RB2?  (Read 4645 times)

There's no DLC in wii version?!?!
Not in GH3 or GHA I doubt it will be in that one :C

Not in GH3 or GHA I doubt it will be in that one :C

There's DLC in GH:WT, I have it and i know for a fact

There's DLC in GH:WT, I have it and i know for a fact
For wii?


god this game SUCKS BALLS! i was so excited to get it and spent all my money on it only to find out IT SUCKS BALLS!!!! i NEED RB2

god this game SUCKS BALLS! i was so excited to get it and spent all my money on it only to find out IT SUCKS BALLS!!!! i NEED RB2
Background information has been demanded, why does it "SUCK BALLS"?

Rock Band 2: More Songs (By ALOT)
GH:WT: Better Gameplay
Rock Band 2: Award for best music game of 2008
GH:WT: Nada....
I Would personally choose RB@ because it has 500 songs :D

Background information has been demanded, why does it "SUCK BALLS"?

That was an exageration (spelling?) but still it's pretty bad. The graphics blow. They're worse than the GH3 graphics. And the game play just plain sucks. It doesn't feel like your playing the music, it feels like your hitting buttons or whacking pads. i think it was rated 7/10 or something and RB2 was rated 8/10. Both ratings are for the wii version.

I think I might try to sell the whole band kit on craig's list because i know i'll get stuff for it at game stop and I can't return it because i got it at Target. (I had $40 worth of gift cards for target)

That was an exageration (spelling?) but still it's pretty bad. The graphics blow. They're worse than the GH3 graphics. And the game play just plain sucks. It doesn't feel like your playing the music, it feels like your hitting buttons or whacking pads. i think it was rated 7/10 or something and RB2 was rated 8/10. Both ratings are for the wii version.
You're ON A WII. You can't complain about graphics, friend. Also, from what I see, that's the only reason.

Yuki, get a clue. The Wii is capable of the same graphics as the Xbox 360. If the game developers choose to have more cartoony graphics and choose not to use it, then that is their problem. The Wii CAN have good graphics though.

Yuki, get a clue. The Wii is capable of the same graphics as the Xbox 360.
Bullstuff, they would have used the same graphics.

It is. The graphics chip is just as powerful. Look at Nintendo's previous games. They focus on gameplay and generally use more cartoony graphics. Also, you can get HD cables which will make it look MUCH better. They will be showing off these graphics in the upcoming game, The Conduit.

I've seen the wii have arguably competitive graphics to a 360. LoZ: TP had pretty good graphics. Metriod Prime 3 had outstanding graphics (for the wii and in general really good graphics).

One of my main points though is that GH3 had better graphics than this. which is ridiculous!

No you are wrong wii can not do 360 graphics.

The clock speed is too low.
(but nobody knows the official stats of the graphics card)

wiki says;
    * CPU: PowerPC-based "Broadway" processor, made with a 90 nm SOI CMOS process, reportedly† clocked at 729 MHz[83]
    * GPU: ATI "Hollywood" GPU made with a 90 nm CMOS process,[84] reportedly† clocked at 243 MHz[83]

†None of the clock rates have been confirmed by Nintendo, IBM, or ATI.