Author Topic: GSF Add-Ons [Carrier's Out!]  (Read 278501 times)

"It sucks" does not help me. You don't like it just because it doesn't go fast and because it doesn't work correctly when it isn't used correctly? Did it ever occur to you that if it went faster than it would take off like a plane? Did it ever occur to you that if you didn't use it as intended then it wouldn't work as intended?
Yeah that's what my boats are...thank you for stating the obvious
Next time use logic please, your opinion means nothing to mean unless you sincerely want to help me; insult is not valuable. They aren't perfect I KNOW, The whole point of these boats is to accept them for what they are since there is no easy way to make a boat.
It'll be a while so I'm not sure when exactly. I want to finish something by this weekend though.
Thanks :)
I really don't think you got the point of what I said.
This doesn't work how right when it's being used right.  Jet skis are supposed to go fast, that's their objective.  and if you made it go faster and it would lift into the air, then maybe you are just not coding your jet ski right, maybe you shouldn't code it to be a plane that doesn't lift.
Maybe you should code it to be a jet ski, hmm?
Seems like you are getting a little bit defensive too ghost, everyone has something we can and can't do, to me it seems like you are better at making maps then making add ons.

Also, if you do start mapping again, please remove "GSF" from them, and make less versions, It makes me try to get my maps above them.

Also, if you do start mapping again, please remove "GSF" from them, and make less versions, It makes me try to get my maps above them.
No,there good how they are but yea GSF is bit of an old name...you need something new.......

Seems like you are getting a little bit defensive too ghost, everyone has something we can and can't do, to me it seems like you are better at making maps then making add ons.
To me it seems I'm a lot better at formulating logical observations than anything. I'm annoyed (not defensive) at people that say my add-ons suck and justify their claims with opinion. Some people say my boats "suck" because they can't turn, without realizing it's for a reason. Some people say my jet ski "sucks" because it doesn't go fast, without realizing I've been testing alternative scripts for weeks.

That's why I'm annoyed. People don't think anymore, they jump to conclusions based on emotion. I don't care if you like it or not, but I do care how you came to that conclusion which helps me improve my add-ons. If you state something negative without a logical reason then I take it as a blind insult. If you don't like it, then respectively explain why, don't blaintly tell me "it sucks" as if your opinion is a fact and you took all considerations of it's purpose.

I really don't think you got the point of what I said.
This doesn't work how right when it's being used right.  Jet skis are supposed to go fast, that's their objective.  and if you made it go faster and it would lift into the air, then maybe you are just not coding your jet ski right, maybe you shouldn't code it to be a plane that doesn't lift.
Maybe you should code it to be a jet ski, hmm?
Yes it does, it works perfectly as intended. Jet skis are supposed to be fun, that's their objective. But, now we are in a digital simulation of reality with limitations. If it went too slow, there would be a problem. If it went too fast, there would be problem. If it's balanced, then it's fine. And I made the right decision to keep it as is because the majority like it and it matches my criteria for it's purpose. The only way to make a boat is to make a plane without lift that is slowed down, or to make it a player datablock. Both have advantages and disadvantages, but using a plane script is the closest I can get to a real life jet ski. See the rationality behind my decision? It can reach it's objective of being fun if people accept it for what it is instead of just concluding "it sucks."


Ghost, I'm not just blidnly insulting your add on, god damn, you are all hung up on the fact that I said "it sucks" once.  I told you what was wrong with it.  I've seen water vehicles go fast before, so it is not impossible for you to do this.  Stop telling me it can't work because you tested it.

Whatever, I'm done.

Whatever, I'm done.
Good. I for one don't find anything wrong with his add-ons, you should give him credit for taking the time to model and script add-ons for you people and what do you say to repay him? "This sucks." I don't think thats entirely fair.

Good. I for one don't find anything wrong with his add-ons, you should give him credit for taking the time to model and script add-ons for you people and what do you say to repay him? "This sucks." I don't think thats entirely fair.
Tough luck kid, welcome to the internet.

Tough luck kid, welcome to the internet.
Welcome? I've been on the internet for a long time.

Welcome? I've been on the internet for a long time.
It's just an expression, don't get your panties in a bunch.

Ghost, I'm not just blidnly insulting your add on, you are all hung up on the fact that I said "it sucks" once.
Logical fallacy; I'm "hung up" that your jumping to conclusions and being prideful, it has NOTHING to do with the add-on. I've tested this for weeks, just give me the benefit of the doubt that I actually know what I'm doing...

Tough luck kid, welcome to the internet.
This is a community, we help each other here.

It's just an expression, don't get your panties in a bunch.
And now your being condescending. That's what I'm trying to point out, you don't want to be wrong.

Whatever, I'm done.
We'll see.

Ghost, you haven't even addressed what he said was wrong.

Ghost, you haven't even addressed what he said was wrong.
... If it went too slow, there would be a problem. If it went too fast, there would be problem. If it's balanced, then it's fine. ... The only way to make a boat is to make a plane without lift that is slowed down, or to make it a player datablock. Both have advantages and disadvantages, but using a plane script is the closest I can get to a real life jet ski.It can reach it's objective of being fun if people accept it for what it is instead of just concluding "it sucks."

I stated it early on in the argument. Since the jet ski can move on all axis any increase in speed would cause it to fly. A remedy would be to use a player datablock, but this would be more difficult. Or, I could lock it to the Z axis, but then it would cause more problems. Also, the way the jet ski is now perfectly fits what it was made for, my GSF Paradise map.

« Last Edit: July 24, 2009, 01:28:21 AM by [GSF]Ghost »

sure everything here works, but i found out something about the jet ski. wfirst i got the stunt plane bcause its cool, then when i saw these addons i got them all too. when i tested my jet ski it worked fine, but then when i used the stunt plane the particles from the jet ski were coming out the right wing in the back of the plane. But anyway these addons PWN  :cookie:s for you

REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING:

GSF Ocean Liner
GSF Tanker
GSF Battleship
GSF Destroyer
GSF Frigate
GSF Aircraft Carrier
GSF HH-65 Dolphin (coast gurad heli)
GSF Container Ship
GSF SpeedBoat
GSF SH-3 Seaking (another coast guard heli)
GSF Coast guard Patrol Boat
GSF Coast Guard Raft
GSF Police Boat
GSF Freighter
GSF Pirate Ship
GSF RowBoat

thanks for making if so!

-ttttttttt