Author Topic: Battlefield...  (Read 4155 times)


Violence is good

So thats who you really are... Saint Dane... -_-

this game now reminds me of halo

1:Blood
2:mild Language
3:Violence

Because no other game has that.

Battlefield was better as a multiplayer-only game with barely any story.
Exactly. 1942 was about the LAN play, back in the day. I remember my first time playing that desert mod, my brother tried flying a helicopter and got 8 consecutive TK's from crashing it.

HAY REMEMBER WHEN BATTLEFIELD DIDN'T TRY TO BE THE NEW CALL OF DUTY GAMES?

OR ANYTHING ELSE FOR THAT MATTER?

*coughwolfensteincough*
HAY REMEMBER WHEN AN FPS THEMED IN MODERN WARFARE WASN'T CONSIDERED A CALL OF DUTY RIPOFF?

YEAH, I'M STILL WAITING FOR THAT DAY TO COME TOO.

That day was before MW came out.

That day was before MW came out.
And became possibly the most overrated game in history

Nah, that's the second one.

It's the next Gears of Kingdom Halo.

Nah, that's the second one.

It's the next Gears of Kingdom Halo.
Actually Halo 1 was very good. After that...

Actually Halo 1 was very good. After that...
They were all good.
In-fact, they were all virtually the same. Get over yourself.

They were all good.
In-fact, they were all virtually the same. Get over yourself.
But Combat Evolved will always have a special place in my heart...

When I saw this I thought "hopefully this is abought the 1943 one."
now i am dissapoint

So thats who you really are... Saint Dane... -_-
A character from a children's book?

Exactly. 1942 was about the LAN play, back in the day. I remember my first time playing that desert mod, my brother tried flying a helicopter and got 8 consecutive TK's from crashing it.
I loved that Desert Combat mod, it felt like desert storm with all of the Abrams driving around and wrecking those Iraqi Tanks. Then EA enslaved the Devs to work on BF2 >:(.

I think battlefield 2 and 1942 are still better.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 02:08:16 PM by Tom Gunn »