This could be up for discussion, but I simply don't trust you with my side of the argument
Not really, it's impossible, you don't even need to be a scientist to figure this stuff out:
1. Pain are signals sent from nervous receptors to the brain (laymans description)
2. Hell is after life, you don't have a body
3. No body, no nervous system, no pain
You could argue the "soul" has its own hypothetical simulation of pain but that's sketchy at best.
Logically:
1. God is all-knowing, all-forgiving, all-loving
2. God creates a place of anguish and suffering and eternal torture
3. What?
Here, you can pick: If god is benevolent, there is no such thing as hell**. If god is Malevolent, then why worship it? Ethically, it'd be more proper to worship Lucifer in that case because Lucifer hasn't killed anyone, where god has massacred civilizations.
**Even as human beings, we do not commit anyone to torture, we typically dedicate their incarceration to their rehabilitation. Most sociopaths are admitted to an asylum. Even the death penalty is made painless, it was designed to remove someone who is extremely dangerous and otherwise not curable.
If one truly fears being burned, drowned, ior whatever, that's what they'll be doing for the rest of their stay in Hell, or so that's how I think it should work.
That's a dumb method.
In the Inferno, your punishment in Hell is your most grievous sin on Earth. In the bible, it's not actually described anywhere.