admit it: if cnn told you to kill youre parents youd do it
nogo the forget back to roblox
Peoples narrowmindedness and stupidity always requires regulation on everything. If the government didn't regulate everything that we did, it'd be sheer chaos simply because we need to live in fear of punishment to achieve anything, and to live a somewhat normal life. A regulation of hate speech is completely necessary, some peoples stupidity (unfortunatly, the place most of this is biased from is America), far surpasses knowing that something they say could infact hurt someones feelings. Granted, there is no way to regulate hate speech except putting a shock collar on everyone, and when they say friend it shocks them.
Of course. My argument revolves around the government silencing the people - something that should be feared and treated as an atrocity. One civilian punching the other in the face for saying friend is irrelevant.
Silencing all hate speech is different than regulating it. I'm not saying that Westboro Baptist church shouldn't be able to express their ideas, I'm just saying that they shouldn't be allowed to do it in such offensive ways at people's funerals.
So I'm guessing that all of you think that what Charles Manson did was okay then since he didn't physically harm anyone.
Alright I'm back. I was busy all weekend. Someone suggest a topic.
Something that is exceedingly controversial, and incites massive arguments.