Author Topic: Child Punishment and your views on it.  (Read 8539 times)

I'd give my kids a smack if they did something really wrong.

I would warn them, take away privileges, threaten them, take them to this guy named Dr. Weathers( Who admits to liking to hurt little children. FML), and then finally hurt them in soen way.

Punishment should not in any way be physical in my opinion. There are other ways to show your child what is good and what is wrong.
Io agree to a certain age, taking away my stuff wont make me do something, but a good whipping would make me do anything :D

This whole tell me how your feeling thing doesn't work for me.


If my kids being a richard, I'll smack him. If he's being just a kid/teenager, let him romp around and be a teenager.

I got this friend and his mom whacked him in the ass about 20 times with a belt for coming over without asking.

You shouldn't hit people. Talk to them instead. L2civilized

You shouldn't hit people. Talk to them instead. L2civilized
This is true. Hitting your children is so last millennium.

Part of it is letting the children know you have the power.
You can take away their things and yell at them, but if they know that's as far as it will ever go then they will gain some power over their parents.
I remember when I was a child, if I was in a real strop about something I could lose all privileges without blinking an eyelid, I could look my parents in the eye and yell back at them, but what allways stopped me in my tracks no matter how much of a resilient brat I was being was being put over my dad's knee and spanked.

Of course it never often came to that, but in time I didn't have to have it done to me to know that it could be.

Depends on the situation, if they do something what I'd consider to be very bad then an ass smack would work. Most parents really don't understand good systems of punishment, grounding kids would only do so much and some kids who don't get physical punishment honestly see no real threat against them. I mean if you could stoll around do anything you like and all your parents do is yell at you at the most then they'll contiune to do so. Don't give me that shouldn't hurt kids bullstuff, if you say that crap then you'll be one of those loving handicapped parents who don't believe a child should do anything without parental supervision. You're only doing more harm then good and kids cannot learn if there is no consequences to begin with, the kids who get in trouble more are ether the ones with parental problems or there parents barely pose a threat to them.

Whole point is, if you have a limit on an ass smacking then you're fine, I know when I was a kid if I did something really really bad I'd get my ass smacked and I hated that so I wouldn't go to that extent because I KNEW it'd happen, when you damn kids now grow up you'd realise that it actually was a good thing and not a bad thing in the long run.

Any kid who doesn't understand that you'll receive pain after doing something really bad is likely to continue to do bad things or grow up not understanding the true meaning of right and wrong. With all that said if your parents have never smack you you they're probably bad parents unless you haven't done anything majority wrong, if you're parents smack you for just about anything then they're just handicapped. Doesn't matter what century we're in pain will set anyone in line, those who believe that language is enough is too stupid to realise Humanity learns from its mistakes and receiving punishment will make them think twice before doing it again.

Whoopin's are for silly people. Its stupid to hit your child if it only inflicts physical damage. Smart parents will give them an idea of what they did wrong by talking to them about what they did. Trust me, children do not like being talked to about what they did wrong.
That won't work for most children.

How old are these children?

-snip-
Exactly, you can't logically convince a kid that something is bad. You must instinctually teach them. It's the same concept as teaching a dog. Eat shoe, get hit with shoe. But obviously less extreme.

You just have to make sure they know that the action they are doing is bad, not themselves.

Depends on the situation, if they do something what I'd consider to be very bad then an ass smack would work. Most parents really don't understand good systems of punishment, grounding kids would only do so much and some kids who don't get physical punishment honestly see no real threat against them. I mean if you could stoll around do anything you like and all your parents do is yell at you at the most then they'll contiune to do so. Don't give me that shouldn't hurt kids bullstuff, if you say that crap then you'll be one of those loving handicapped parents who don't believe a child should do anything without parental supervision. You're only doing more harm then good and kids cannot learn if there is no consequences to begin with, the kids who get in trouble more are ether the ones with parental problems or there parents barely pose a threat to them.

Whole point is, if you have a limit on an ass smacking then you're fine, I know when I was a kid if I did something really really bad I'd get my ass smacked and I hated that so I wouldn't go to that extent because I KNEW it'd happen, when you damn kids now grow up you'd realise that it actually was a good thing and not a bad thing in the long run.

Any kid who doesn't understand that you'll receive pain after doing something really bad is likely to continue to do bad things or grow up not understanding the true meaning of right and wrong. With all that said if your parents have never smack you you they're probably bad parents unless you haven't done anything majority wrong, if you're parents smack you for just about anything then they're just handicapped. Doesn't matter what century we're in pain will set anyone in line, those who believe that language is enough is too stupid to realise Humanity learns from its mistakes and receiving punishment will make them think twice before doing it again.



<3


A teacher at my school once told me/the class that he hits his children when they're very naughty.
Of course he doesn't mean belting them, but a firm slap that will hurt, but not badly, if you understand.

He only hits them though, because he believes it's a natural idea.
He used the brown townogy of a child, or anyone, doing something bad and getting hurt.
Say you stick your hand in a fire. It hurts, a lot. It hurts and that pain sticks in your mind and you don't ever do it again. It's your body and brain's way of telling you that what you've done is dangerous and it is not good to do.
So, he sees the idea of making a child feel a light bit of physical pain for doing something very naughty as a natural idea, as that bit of pain also sticks into your mind, and the child know's that what they have done is dangerous for them and will get them hurt.
Which is true, because in cases where someone is so bad that they need a little physical punishment, it is generally based on the child having done something dangerous, whether that is physically dangerous, or even a crime, which has it's dangers.

They deserve to be whipped in the ass by a belt for everythign they do wrong
My parents sometimes smack my hands, slap me upside the head, whup my ass, etc.