The Royal Wedding

[Dodger]

Because it's interesting, as Colten said. I saw an American woman on the news who was in London and she said she wanted to experience this because the US don't have a monarchy.

Representative monarchs are over hyped, I would never want one in the US.

Also, we don't even need a loving figure head with power (hint: the president), just encourages stuffty mass politics.

[Ad Bot]

[tails]

i cant understand half of what british people say. and when they get louder and start shouting that bloody this and that garbage i tune em out.
what a disgusting sound.

:(

[ChexGuy331]

i cant understand half of what british people say. and when they get louder and start shouting that bloody this and that garbage i tune em out.
what a disgusting sound.

but nige has an awesome voice.

[Dodger]

Melvin is a loving pro.

[nickbond1]

Inb4terrorist

[Jetlok]

EWWWW.

[Azzurolix]

EWWWW.

I assume you haven't seen Romanian "royalty" yet.

[Ningyou]

I honestly don't care if 2 rich people get married across the world. So what, they are married. Kings and Queens literary have no power in their government.

For the most part monarchs are figure heads but lets say, for example, a minister wants to make a new law. That law has to be approved by the monarch for it to be applied, so I wouldn't say they have literally no power.

Representative monarchs are over hyped, I would never want one in the US.

Also, we don't even need a loving figure head with power (hint: the president), just encourages stuffty mass politics.

I'm not saying the US should get one. It's just what the woman said.

[rockslide26]

Does anyone else realize that British Royalty has been inbreeding for so long, banging cousins and sisters?

[Dodger]

I'm not saying the US should get one. It's just what the woman said.

She is just stupid and easily swayed by mass politics most likely.

[Colten]

She is just stupid and easily swayed by mass politics most likely.

The woman never said she wanted a monarchy in the US either, she just said it was interesting because the US didnt have one

Youre all just getting angry over nothing if you dont care about the Royal Wedding dont watch it

[rockslide26]

For the most part monarchs are figure heads but lets say, for example, a minister wants to make a new law. That law has to be approved by the monarch for it to be applied, so I wouldn't say they have literally no power.I'm not saying the US should get one. It's just what the woman said.

Barack Obama is a representative monarch, he makes lots of money and doesn't do stuff.

[Dodger]

The woman never said she wanted a monarchy in the US either, she just said it was interesting because the US didnt have one

Youre all just getting angry over nothing if you dont care about the Royal Wedding dont watch it

ANGER IT BUILDS UP INSIDE ME

Anyways, I care more about my media focusing on real issues in the world rather than some over-hyped people of importance who don't really contribute to society getting married in a foreign country. So no, I will not watch it.

[Tom]

Barack Obama is a representative monarch, he makes lots of money and doesn't do stuff.

Yeah I would agree. Even though the U.S. president does have veto power, he can't very much more without it being approved by congress.

[Colten]

ANGER IT BUILDS UP INSIDE ME

Anyways, I care more about my media focusing on real issues in the world rather than some over-hyped people of importance who don't really contribute to society getting married in a foreign country. So no, I will not watch it.

Id much rather see a Royal Wedding than the best ways to spend coupons and what the black guy down the street did