Ghille & Aware14

Author Topic: Ghille & Aware14  (Read 8892 times)

so they finally come around and ask you what they can improve, and now you're angry at them for that? basically you won the 9 page argument and now you're angry that they've admitted they're wrong and want to improve - wtf sort of logic is that
Exactly what I was thinking.

You were a richard and told them problems then they [bitched and whined for pages upon pages, then come around] ask you how to improve and you yell [tell them outright you don't like the pack] at them? Wtf

Exactly and what the forget did Aware do other then ask you.
img
Deny any problems I presented with his pack.
Insulted me over it.
Kept bringing me back to the topic just to tell them that whatever flame / "argument" they spat at me was wrong, and to repeat the exact same issues.
Constantly bitched and insulted me.

However, Ghille did the worst of it.

So uh

Y'know I'm not going to look through 2000+ pages to find one where you're getting bitched at, right? Link?
A whole nine pages! Such a time waster!
It starts around page three, just in case you want to really compress things and if you're impatient.

so they finally come around and ask you what they can improve, and now you're angry at them for that? basically you won the 9 page argument and now you're angry that they've admitted they're wrong and want to improve - wtf sort of logic is that
They never did this. I find it irritating that they're asking for the exact same suggestions I've been giving them. If they wanted my advice they could've just, y'know, read the entire nine pages of stuff they denied.


Just for future reference, don't take a position here if you don't actually read the conversations and threads at hand.

Deny any problems I presented with his pack.
Insulted me over it.
Kept bringing me back to the topic just to tell them that whatever flame / "argument" they spat at me was wrong, and to repeat the exact same issues.
Constantly bitched and insulted me.

However, Ghille did the worst of it.
A whole nine pages! Such a time waster!
It starts around page three, just in case you want to really compress things and if you're impatient.
They never did this. I find it irritating that they're asking for the exact same suggestions I've been giving them. If they wanted my advice they could've just, y'know, read the entire nine pages of stuff they denied.


Just for future reference, don't take a position here if you don't actually read the conversations and threads at hand.
BECAUSE YOU loving FORCED YOUR OPINION DOWN THEIR THROAT AND ACTED LIKE THEY NEEDED TO FOLLOW IT.

lmfao

all they did is ask for your help and you chucked (and are chucking) a stufffit. you could have ignored it but now you're trying to act like they're national socialists for it

what a baby

lmfao

all they did is ask for your help and you chucked (and are chucking) a stufffit. you could have ignored it but now you're trying to act like they're national socialists for it

what a baby
This post confuses me beyond belief. I'm totally calm, I'm not throwing a fit of any kind. How does me pointing out that they're being hypocritical make them national socialists?

Who is the baby? Them? Me? If you're referring to me, you'd say "you are a baby" otherwise you'd be talking about me in an odd third-person kind of way, or them for some odd reason.

BECAUSE YOU loving FORCED YOUR OPINION DOWN THEIR THROAT AND ACTED LIKE THEY NEEDED TO FOLLOW IT.
If you actually took time to read those topics, I said multiple times that I wasn't forcing them to follow my suggestions.

I honestly don't think you can read.

(...)
Kaphonaits was making coherent arguments at first. Now he's complaining about how the pack isn't how he wants it.
(...)
(Response:)
Wrong. I'm making suggestions. If you read my posts, I'm not forcing him to do anything. I'm telling him that "this is a better way to do it".
(...)

These quotes make you sound like you're forcing them to do it.

I'm not sure if you fully intended that, but that's what it looks like.
(Response: )
Not at all. :(

What are you talking about? They fixed and added the things you wanted. You said you still hated them so he asked you what more you wanted. He wasn't sucking up to you.

This post confuses me beyond belief. I'm totally calm, I'm not throwing a fit of any kind. How does me pointing out that they're being hypocritical make them national socialists?

Who is the baby? Them? Me? If you're referring to me, you'd say "you are a baby" otherwise you'd be talking about me in an odd third-person kind of way, or them for some odd reason.
You've been fighting with them for a while, and finally they give up and ask what they can improve
now you're having a go at them for that

you are the baby. you cannot be pleased. you are in the wrong here.

simple

You've been fighting with them for a while, and finally they give up and ask what they can improve
now you're having a go at them for that

you are the baby. you cannot be pleased. you are in the wrong here.

simple
I applaud you for pointing out things that were in the OP, as if no one could read them there. I said I wouldn't be pleased by this because it just wasn't good. I'm not "having a go" at them. I haven't made any personal attacks on them in this topic, or almost anywhere for that matter. If I have made something that can be agreed on as a "personal attack" then I apologize for that.

What are you talking about? They fixed and added the things you wanted. You said you still hated them so he asked you what more you wanted. He wasn't sucking up to you.
I find it irritating that they seem partially dependent on my approval after bitching so much. I told them I tested what they changed and I still didn't like it. That's why in the topic I said "I'm done here", because there was literally nothing they could do to get me to like it or approve of it for that matter.


This topic was created because I was so irritated at the hypocrisy that was displayed. I don't want to have to repeat myself.

I applaud you for pointing out things that were in the OP, as if no one could read them there. I said I wouldn't be pleased by this because it just wasn't good. I'm not "having a go" at them. I haven't made any personal attacks on them in this topic, or almost anywhere for that matter. If I have made something that can be agreed on as a "personal attack" then I apologize for that.

This topic was created because I was so irritated at the hypocrisy that was displayed. I don't want to have to repeat myself.
you are having a go at them, you're calling them hypocrites by your own admission

you are an over sensitive prick. they've literally done nothing more than ask for your help this time (protip, say NO next time instead of getting your panties in such a bunch)

you are having a go at them, you're calling them hypocrites by your own admission

you are an over sensitive prick. they've literally done nothing more than ask for your help this time (protip, say NO next time instead of getting your panties in such a bunch)
Then there was that time where they flamed and whined for nine pages. Maybe that's why I had my "panties in such a bunch". I called them hypocrites because they deserved that title.

Why do I keep having to repeat myself, why can't people just learn to read before making pointless responses that I can answer with the same reasoning?

Then there was that time where they flamed and whined for nine pages. Maybe that's why I had my "panties in such a bunch". I called them hypocrites because they deserved that title.
so what you're saying is that you're butthurt because of that?

what they've done this time doesn't warrant your response. this time, they haven't done anything wrong. this time, you've overreacted. are you starting to get it yet?

so what you're saying is that you're butthurt because of that?

what they've done this time doesn't warrant your response. this time, they haven't done anything wrong. this time, you've overreacted. are you starting to get it yet?
I never said I was butthurt. I'm saying I was irritated and was using your words for that. What is there to be butthurt over from my perspective? What they've done wrong here is come around and request what should be fixed about this pack even though they rejected it so many times before. I find that irritating and thus this topic was created. I've said that before.

In the IRC chats I didn't "overreact", but rather explain what I meant in full detail.

All you're doing is taking what has happened out of context to make it look like they've done little to nothing wrong and that's just not the case here.

I also find it irritating that you're requesting the same information from me that can already be found in this topic.

you know, even though boltster is pretty blunt himself he's right. you pretty much started this whole thing by pretty much flaming their weapon pack.

it doesn't help when you start it off with these little beauties:

Plain awful.

The best part is that there is only a few pieces of stuff, instead of a large pile.

read those a few times and think about it for a while.

kaph, unless you've got something else to support your drama topic you've got absolutely nothing to go on.

the pictures you've tried to use as backup in the OP paint the picture of them trying to improve and you being a cunt. that's why i'm saying you're butthurt.

i don't like either of them, but they don't look like they're doing anything wrong

you're at fault here for being richardy. you could have just ignored them instead of going to all this effort over something so harmless.
you shouldn't be talking about being richardy.