This is nonsense. You have to start off defining these "laws of nature". All I can think of is gravity, laws regarding how energy works etc. but those laws can't be broken. so I'm not sure what you're saying.
Gravity and laws of energy and such are Laws of Physics, not Laws of Nature.
The laws of physics will define the laws of nature, but not the other way around, as the laws of physics are the rules to how the entire universe works. The laws of nature are the rules to how life works.
A law of nature is more along the lines that two similar organisms in the same environment at the same time will always compete for resources...
Populations will continue to grow so long as they aren't limited by a factor...
"Law of Nature" is a kinda vague thing with no actual laws you can really really define, but it's how life works in general.
And since we can't truly define a "law of nature", since it's not so much a rule, as it is the most common thing in most scenarios, it is possible for an organism to break a law of nature.
So we have nothing going for us?
The ability to communicate and build things using tools is nothing?
The ability to build things is what Qwepir was talking about.
It's something that most other organisms can't do. Some can, like monkeys using sticks to get into termite-nests, or using rocks to break coconuts, but not at the same level that we do.
But Humans are the only creatures that create and use new tools in order to accomplish it's needs. Which is how you seperate us from everything else in nature.
Since it's difficult to say what exactly is a "law of nature", we instead go by saying what is the norm for nature.
Which in this case is not using tools.
So, through the way that humans act we seemingly go against what would otherwise appear to be a "law of nature"
