Look at what happened to Chik-Fil-A for example. They said they don't believe gay people should marry, and you know what happened. A bunch of people get mad at Chik-Fil-A and do their best to offend them.
It was a lot more than just saying it, they also donate money to groups that work against it, and they don't want to give them there money.
Not requiring, just forcing on churches if the couple wants to marry in a church.
Neither should the government be allowed to say who can't marry.
So our country should decide what religions do and do not? That doesn't sound very free.
The forget? Did you just skip reading and assume I was saying something against you? I said that church and state are supposed to be seperate, so no, laws making churches required to marry same love coupled should not exist. I was agreeing with what you said. Laws should not be passed
requiring churchs to allow it. I was
agreeingwith you.
It says that when Jesus arrived, the more strict laws like what to eat and how to dress were lifted.
The last time I was dragged to a church, the pastor said that the only thing Jesus changed was that you no longer have to sacrifice animals to be forgiven for your sins, you just get it automatically through Jesus