JURORS FIND ZIMMERMAN NOT GUILTY

[Kaiiu]

are you handicapped? it's VERY important whether he picked the fight or not. some1 has an agenda lol

[Ad Bot]

[Aripany]

Okay, let me explain this with small words so even a 420 burn it yolo cigarette like you can understand.

If the attorney had gone for manslaughter instead of murder, the provoke would have been the lynchpin in the case. Instead, they pressed for murder, which is killing with premeditated malicious intent. In small words, if Zimmerman had went out there with a specific agenda to kill Martin or someone. Since there was no way to prove this, the verdict was not guilty. Had they gone for manslaughter it would've been a toss up.

[Kaiiu]

Okay, let me explain this with small words so even a 420 burn it yolo cigarette like you can understand.

If the attorney had gone for manslaughter instead of murder, the provoke would have been the lynchpin in the case. Instead, they pressed for murder, which is killing with premeditated malicious intent. In small words, if Zimmerman had went out there with a specific agenda to kill Martin or someone. Since there was no way to prove this, the verdict was not guilty. Had they gone for manslaughter it would've been a toss up.

Except they went for both jackass. Nice try tho. Shows how much you watched the trial.

[Aripany]

Lol no, they didn't. They pressed for murder and as a right since that's what he was tried for when they tried to go for manslaughter it was thrown out.

[Kaiiu]

Lol no, they didn't. They pressed for murder and as a right since that's what he was tried for when they tried to go for manslaughter it was thrown out.

Wikipedia:

On Saturday, July 13, 2013, the jury found Zimmerman not guilty of second-degree murder and of manslaughter. The six women in the jury delivered their verdict after more than 16 hours of deliberations.

[Aripany]

Firstly, wikipedia is easily altered and contains errors. Secondly, they pressed for manslaughter after they pretty much got destroyed in the murder charge. Everyone in the US has a right that fits perfectly with this case. It's one of Amendments 5-7. Basically, unless it's some sort of plea bargain, you can't say "Oh well if he's not going to be convicted of this serious charge, I wanna charge him with a smaller one." It's you either get it with what you say the first time or you don't. Right to retrial is only if you come up with new evidence, which hasn't happened.

[Kaiiu]

Firstly, wikipedia is easily altered and contains errors.

Backpeddle!!!
and wtf is the rest of the bs you posted. you were WRONG LOL
More sources:

Men's Wearhouse Spokesman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who fatally shot Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, igniting a national debate on racial profiling and civil rights, was found not guilty late Saturday night of second-degree murder. He was also acquitted of manslaughter, a lesser charge.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/us/george-zimmerman-verdict-trayvon-martin.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

They can convict him of the second-degree murder of Trayvon Martin, they can convict him of manslaughter or they can declare him not guilty of anything.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/11/19415120-zimmerman-trial-case-bound-for-jury-today?lite

this is why you shouldn't post about things when you have no idea wtf you're talking about. skram furcigarette lmaooo

[Aripany]

Tbh I am really rusty on this crap. You've got me on every point but this: You're being just as biased as you claim I am. You have to remember that after the call ended no one really knows what happened beyond Martin and Zimmerman fighting and Martin being shot. The evidence was scarce and leaning towards Zimmerman's story.

[Madmitten]

i heard that the jury asked whether or not he was charged with manslaughter and the defense gave no reply

[Evan5626]

Okay, let me explain this with small words so even a 420 burn it yolo cigarette like you can understand.

If the attorney had gone for manslaughter instead of murder, the provoke would have been the lynchpin in the case. Instead, they pressed for murder, which is killing with premeditated malicious intent. In small words, if Zimmerman had went out there with a specific agenda to kill Martin or someone. Since there was no way to prove this, the verdict was not guilty. Had they gone for manslaughter it would've been a toss up.

Who are you? (I'm being serious, are you new to the forums or an alt?) You just joined the forums in June and are already acting like you own the stuff. You start fights with everyone, lmao.

Aside from that, you're just like the other idiots who think that just because Trayvon was a "thug" that that has anything to do with the case. Just because he's done bad things in the past doesn't mean that it must of been him who started the fight, because Zimmerman is obviously an angel, right?

Tbh I am really rusty on this crap. You've got me on every point but this: You're being just as biased as you claim I am. You have to remember that after the call ended no one really knows what happened beyond Martin and Zimmerman fighting and Martin being shot. The evidence was scarce and leaning towards Zimmerman's story.

There WAS only one story. You're acting like this is a two-sided argument. Trayvon obviously didn't get to share his side. The rest are guesses from people who didn't see it clearly/weren't there. Then there are the idiots who think it's solely because of race, but that's another story.

[Kaiiu]

Tbh I am really rusty on this crap. You've got me on every point but this: You're being just as biased as you claim I am. You have to remember that after the call ended no one really knows what happened beyond Martin and Zimmerman fighting and Martin being shot. The evidence was scarce and leaning towards Zimmerman's story.

don't come into this thread with your chest puffed up then jackass. evidence did lean to zimmy's side, but you were acting like it was obvious. like i said before, no one knows what went down except wannabe cop loser zimmerman. there is still a lot of stuff like george's story being filled with lies, and trayvon's hands not having DNA on them.

[Aripany]

don't come into this thread with your chest puffed up then jackass.

Isn't that all you ever do?

evidence did lean to zimmy's side, but you were acting like it was obvious. like i said before, no one knows what went down except wannabe cop loser zimmerman. there is still a lot of stuff like george's story being filled with lies, and trayvon's hands not having DNA on them.

Martins knuckles were scuffed and bruised from the fight. As for the DNA, I'm not totally sure. Both stories were filled with lies, Zimmerman's less so.

[RaR]

Isn't that all you ever do?

the difference being that you're wrong and he's right

[Kaiiu]

Isn't that all you ever do?

except i back my stuff up. and I'm Kaiiu

Both stories were filled with lies, Zimmerman's less so.

both stories? wtf? trayvon dead bruh.

[heedicalking]

Okay, let me explain this with small words so even a 420 burn it yolo cigarette like you can understand.

lol the only thing he's burning right now is you