Basically a non-radioactive nuke. You're kidding, right? I said that thing about the spirit of the law with the nuke rule, and you do this?
A non-radiactive nu- What? Are
you kidding
me? There's no such thing as a non-radioactive nuke, that's called a bomb. Why? Because it blows up. This isn't either, this simply causes an explosion due to the speed of impact, which is simple combustion due to force of impact. After that? It causes earthquakes due to said impact because of the force, causing plates to shift.
Lol, This can't even be considered a proper WMD, the tungsten rod itself is the only weapon and even then the after effects are from how nature works.
weap·on of mass de·struc·tion
noun
1.
a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction.
The rod isn't chemical, biological, or radioactive. It's capable of causing widespread death and destruction, yes, but that's not from the initial impact. The tungsten rod acts similarly as to the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs, except on a extremely extremely extremely smaller scale. In this case, all it's doing is inticing the earth to shift and move plates highly aggressively, causing a large amount of destruction that's only logical and realistic. This is a Conventional weapon.
Honestly, the nuke rule should simply be removed by this point. It was added earlier on only because of how early in the roleplay it was. We were still confined to europe, and we were just starting. Now? It's 2015, if people want to start launching nukes they should be allowed to. Why? Freedom to the player. 'Overpowered weapons'? Overpowered is not a correct term, there is no limit to power for it to go over. At most, you should restrict 'god' weapons, which is what I used in humanities future. I destroyed an entire planet. God weapons go beyond the boundary of fun. While it is technically possible it has the capability of ending the roleplaying in one move, and is just a richard move. Medusa and Scimitar? They were all made with careful study of how these things work, there's no reason they should be barred.
Now before you bring up they have no good reason to use these... ICly, a reason is a reason. Whether it's determined a good or bad reason shouldn't matter, most humans base what is good and bad on their own definition of the words and what categories fall under the two.
Lib·er·ate
set (someone) free from a situation, esp. imprisonment or slavery, in which their liberty is severely restricted. I know what it means, I said that IC I don't need you to define it for me, thank you very much.
And were did the rod hit? For all you know it could have landed in the rebel camp. I dont think you know were Relenoy is. I will tell Plethora were relenoy is and you tell the rest of the world were your missle hit. Plethora will tell the rest of the world if it hit or not. I will ask him not to tell were relenoy is just say if it hit or not This is extremely loving stupid. It has the capabilities of a sattelite, it can target ANYWHERE in the city, lock onto it and launch. I hit center mass, the center of the city. Why? That's the only logical play to target it and I thought that'd be a given, though I may have overestimated your capability of thinking properly. I don't have to OOCly know where Relenoy is, using satellites I know where it is ICly. Plethora doesn't control the guidance of my projecile. Why? Because he's not the one firing it to begin with. It's going too fast to go off track at a speed of mach 10.
Poll